RES 90076 - Laserfiche WebLink

Excerpts of the Planning Commission Meeting of 3/14/90 Review of CIP 19~0-9~ throuoh 1994-~5 Mr. Swift presented the staff report and noted that Sue Rossi and Joe Eliiott were present to answer questions. Chairman Michelotti asked when the City Council will look at the overall budget. Mr. Swift said they will review the Capital Improvement Program in a work session in March; action on that will take place in April; and budget approval will be in May. Commissioner Hovingh expressed concern about developer contributions on street projects. He wondered whether the second bridge: Bernal @ Arroyo de la Laguna was going to be funded by Laguna Oaks. Mr. Swift said it is planned that bridge will be funded Dy a combination of Laguna Oaks and the San Francisco Water Department. The Laguna Oaks project will be building a bridge. report that should be presentation of developer contribution, and simply project until the plans are more defined. two-lane bridge on the south side of the existing Commissioner Hovingh noted that further on in the bridge is listed as being unfunded and felt that changed in the report. Ms. Rossi responded that for sake they had planned to delete the revenue source show it as an unfunded Commissioner Hovingh asked if a signal light is planned for N. Muirwood Drive and Stoneridge. Mr. Swift said that is intended to go out to bid in the immediate future. Commissioner Mahern asked about the widening of Foothill Road/Hem~y and whether that was funded. Ms. Rossi said they have received to date $24,550 in developer contributions; the balance at this point of the project is unfunded. Commissioner Mahern discussed with Mr. Swift the feasibility of adding the widening of Foothill Road to the Capital Improvement Program. The consensus was that it was not ~easible at this time to add it to the Program. A motion was made by Commissioner Berger, seconded by Commissioner Mahern ~inding that the Draft Capital Improvement Program, as a whole and as individual pro~ects, is consistent with the General Plan; and recommended as the priorities for ~unding those projects identified in the Draft Program. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Berger, Hovingh, Mahern, McGuirk, and Chairman Michelotti None Commissioner Horan None NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Resolution No. PC-90-26 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Draft Capital Improvement Program as motioned.