Laserfiche WebLink
working on the detailed design wa-k and that the general alignment was shown i^ the Specific <br />Plan. Ile added that the exact location of the road would be engineered to take design <br />considerations, slopes, and emergency access into account FIe was aware that these issues had <br />been under discussion beriveen the Oily and Mr. Jardin for some time and that the road was <br />pushed further up the hill, away from his house. When the t latsushi YUD was approved by the <br />City Council in 200, the construction of the Clara i.ane extension was a very high priority to <br />them. A condition of approval was added to indicate a preference that Clara Lane be extended to <br />the llatsushi property at the earliest feasible opportunity. He noted that it was forhmate that Mr. <br />Aminian"s plan was going through at the same time. <br />[n response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding the removal of trees in front of <br />Mr. Jardin's home, Mr. Jost replied that when Dclcu Builders entered into an agreement with <br />Mr. Jardin to subdivide his property, there was also a discussion regarding the extension of Clara <br />Lane. At that time, Delco Builder's engineers prepared au alignment plan, shown as Exhibit F. <br />Grant deeds to the City for both the right of way of Clara Lane and easements as well as <br />construction easements were sent to Mr. Jardin, who then signed those deeds, which were turned <br />over to the City. Staff felt that the grant deeds signed by Mr. Jardin at that time were sufficient <br />for the alignment. There was also a grant decd to the City by Mr. Nespor, which added to the <br />alignment for Clara Lane, which did not have much wiggle room. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether the new road would be <br />farther north than the current edge, Mr. ,Yost confirmed that was correct and displayed the layout <br />of the road on the overhead screen. IIe added that Mr. Jardin's house would be bcluw the grade <br />and that athree-foot retaining wall would he installed. <br />A discussion of the setbacl. measurements ensued. <br />hl response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether the legal issues <br />surrounding Mr. Jardin's property had been resolved, Ms. I larryman replied that there had bee^ <br />several phone meetings with Mr. Jardin's attorney, and that this issue had been thoroughly <br />discussed and resolved. She realized that Mr. Jardin was not happy with the results and that it <br />was close to his home. She noted that this was the deal struck with Mr. Jardin when he sold the <br />property to Delco Builders. <br />Commissioner O'Connor suggested that the City narrow the road slightly if possible, near the <br />small setback on Mr. ,Iardin's property by removing the parking allowed on one side of the street. <br />Commissioner Olsun inquired whether the retaining wall could be placed at the edge of the <br />current paved road and work ti•om there. Mr. Jost believed there may he a problem getting down <br />to Mr. Jardin's driveway if that were to occur, and that he may have to give up the driveway in <br />front of his house. <br />Chairperson Fox moved to reopen the public hearing . <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMM(SSU)N MlNUTGS, .lanuary 10, '?007 Page ~ of 8 <br />