Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Giffin noted that the chimneys could be made ofbrick. and added that Lot 3 appeared to <br />have a stone chimney. <br />Mr. Aminian indicated that they ~~ould support the Planning Commission's proposed changes. <br />He reiterated that ou Lot 1, he would like to lower the roof pitch by I.5 feel and lower the grade <br />under the house by two feet. }Ie also reiterated that he wants to build the Clara Lane extension <br />first in order to bring the utilities in before building on Lots ?and ~; Lot 1 would he last. f le <br />believed Delco Builders would have some information about the Clara Lace extension. <br />Commissioner Olson requested further clarification regarding Condition No. 73. and a 3:1 slope <br />versus a 2:1 slope, as well as discussion about retaining walls. Ms. Giffin replied that staff <br />recommended that the slope go to is i, unless that was not feasible for an unforeseen reason such <br />as' geotechnical constraints. The Vineyard Corridor Specitic Plan recommended that the slope be <br />3: I, which would necessitate the installation of two retaining walls. <br />Commissioner Blank moved to find that there are no new or changed circumstances or <br />information that require additional CEQA review of the project and that the proposed <br />PUD development is consistent with the General Plan, the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan, <br />and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; to make the YUD findings listed in the staff report; <br />and to recommend approval of Case PUD-56, subject to the conditions of approval listed in <br />Exhibit B of the staff report as recommended by staff, with the modification that a <br />disclosure he made that animals live near the property xnd may create noise, odor, and <br />other impacts; that the grade under the house on Lot 1 be dug down by rivo feet and the <br />roof be lowered by 1.5 feet; and that construction-related equipment and vehicles come to <br />and from the site between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. only. <br />Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. <br />Chairperson Fox requested an amendment to the motion that the driveway leading to Lot ] <br />be a color and material which blend in with the hillsides, with the color and material <br />subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director, that the chimney materials on <br />each lot be different from one another and from the main exterior body material of the <br />house and that the spark arrestors blend in with the color of the chimney, with the rotors <br />and materials subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director <br />('hairperson Fox would like the orientation of the middle house to be changed so the garage <br />would be rotated 9U degrees to reduce the mass of the house. <br />Mr. Ibrahim noted that if the garage on l,ot 2 were to be rotated 90 degrees, higher retaining <br />walls would be required because of the slope of the lox. <br />Commissioner Blank reyuested an amendment that significant tree landscaping such as <br />seven to eight additional trees he added around the garage on Lot 2 to reduce the garage's <br />appearance, with the final landscaping plan to be subject to the review and approval of the <br />Planning Director. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING CUMUlISS10N MINUTES, .fanuary f 0, ?007 Page 7 of 8 <br />