18 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Message Jenny Soo From: Jimy Uranwala ] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:57 PM To: Jenny Soo Subject: PCUP-155/PDR-513 Tinity Lutheran Church Hi Jenny, I sent you my objections before. I attended the meeting yesterday and would like to add more: Pace 1 of 2 It is important to keep in mind what Pleasanton is about, our history and especially that of our neighborhood. Pleasanton is a family town. Focus on family residences. That has been so for 30+ years, is in every document and plan (I have been on two task forces, have a copy of the entire General Plan). Almost all who live in Pleasanton, came here and bought homes here for that reason. This is very true of Del Valle Parkway, the street I've lived on for 17 years and where the church is. It was a DEAD END street. It was just 1/4 mile long but was extended to Main Street because the merchants on Main Street wanted people to have to go past their stores (and now they complain of too much traffic!) That was enough catering to commercial interests instead of the residents. It is still a short street 1/2 mile long. When VCC (the church on the Main Street end), wanted to expand, it too claimed traffic etc. would not get worse. The City over rode our objections and approved it. Can anyone deny that has not been proved wrong? The traffic is far worse and the street falls apart soon after every repair. (We just had one). Residents -and even VCC -have had to post signs about parking and to slow down. More on VCC and all that in my last email. Our street is still pretty short and now the church on the Hopyard end wants considerable expansion too for "activities". (What is this -the battle of churches for prestige? Is that what Christ preached?) Which means more people, which means more traffic and more street wear. Same as what happened with VCC. If there was a single thing presented that proves otherwise, please show it to me. And that too on a corner already overburdened from Hopyard becoming one lane right there where it meets Division, the route for most to downtown and the Fairgrounds. Can you imagine being squished between these two on either end of our short street? Note that when we and many others bought our houses, this same church was NOTHING like even what is now. I would like to see their original application. It was park like land adjacent to the park designed for SMALL children that's next to it where children play. Right next to the church is a day care center that was one small house when I came. I didn't even know it was a day care. The city also approved that expanding to three, in spite of inadequate parking so they use the church's - as even the presenter yesterday acknowledged. Also note that the church's get special treatment as a church, but their expansions are for many activities that many groups/activities use/rent for commercial purposes (how does that fit with their religous charter?). Constant events almost every day versus the traditional "mostly Sundays" that was their norm when I and many others bought our homes here. I am all for community activities but they should be in the right place and I question that the church should be given special treatment to enter into the what is the city's domain. If they wanted to do so, fine, but then they should have picked a commercial location where they could so expand. It is not right to devalue and make us the residents and their neighbors, pay for their wants. Which brings up the irony that it is a CHURCH that is doing so and being "unneighborly" and "untrustworthy" as another lady said yesterday! I suggest that the church first get to know its neighbors and choose a path that benefits both, not this expansion that causes hostility and will surely lead to actions all would rather avoid if possible. I am sure the church means well and welcome the opportunity to meet their pastor and establish a good neighbor relationship. Feel free to pass this email on to them. BOTTOM LINE: The church claims their expansion will be good for the neighborhood. If that was true then it 9i8i?006