Laserfiche WebLink
Pa~~e 1 of l <br />You forwarded this message on 11/19/2006 10:52 AM. <br />Lorie Tinfow <br />From: <br />To: <br />Cc: <br />Subject: <br />Attachments: <br />Lorie; <br />Roger Manning [roger~ihomes-lots.com] <br />Lorie Tinfow <br />Blue Ribbon <br />Sent: Thu 11/2/2006 12:13 PM <br />As you may remember, I will not be at the 11 /9 meeting due to a vacation trip <br />My vote for submittal to the City Council would be option # 1 which would establish a by-pass route with no <br />recommendation on the number of homes I have never felt comfortable in establishing a number for the <br />homes, feeling that that is a negotiation item between the City Council, staff and Greenbrier The road, which <br />has to be built, (the status quo not being an option) has a cost which only can be covered at a cost of "x" <br />number of homes I don't believe our committee can recommend much less negotiate this without looking at all <br />of the other amenities attached to a typical PUD. The staff and City Council can best negotiate a "total <br />package" that would be acceptable to the residents of Pleasnaton <br />The design and or other suggestions you noted can be submitted for staff consideration <br />If the committee feels a need to submit a house number along with a road recommendation my vote would be <br />option #4 in that I don't believe Greenbrier (or even the Spotorno's) would go at all with options 2 or 3 <br />If I need to clarify this ore vvay or the other please e-mail me back as i will be here until Monday am <br />Roger Manning <br />Ps' Sorry to be losing you You have done an excellent lob with our committee and I wish you the best in <br />Walnut Creek. Congratulations <br />httpsJ/webmail.ci.iileasanton.ca.us,'exchange!ltinfo~~!Inhoz!E31ue"~~~'ORibbon.E~9L`'Cmd ... 1'?4!ZOO7 <br />