Laserfiche WebLink
^ Kelly Fasman (California Reflections) <br />^ Ken Blair (686 Concord Place) <br />^ Lisa Olson (Greenwood Road) <br />^ Lois Jessee (3263 Vineyard Avenue, <br />#1 l7) <br />^ Lynn Thomas <br />^ Marcia Brandt (3409 Touriga Drive) <br />^ Marilyn L. Grimes (962 Concord Street) <br />^ Mark Posson (3036 Chardonnay Drive) <br />^ Matthew and Donna Walker (462 Tioga <br />Court) <br />^ Michelle LaMarche (1234 Hearst <br />Drive) <br />^ Moises and Sonia Palacios (3563-A <br />Bernal Avenue) <br />^ Nancy Allen <br />^ Nancy Millholf (Vintage Heights) <br />^ Nancy Storch (3193 Chardonnay <br />Drive) <br />^ Nancy Waechter <br />^ Pat Costello <br />^ Pat Mensing <br />^ Paul Zampierin <br />^ Rabbi Richard Winer (Congregation <br />Beth Emek, 3400 Nevada Court) <br />^ Richard A. Migliore (640 Romeo <br />Court) <br />^ Robert David (4105 Morganfield <br />Court) <br />^ Robert Gonella <br />^ Ron Taylor <br />^ Rose 7,ieker <br />^ Schonfer <br />^ Shannon Irving (1560 Oxsen Street) <br />^ Sonia Cehic <br />^ Steve and Kathy Jones (4166 IIall <br />Court) <br />^ Steve and Marge Andrews (886 Mon- <br />tevino Drive) <br />^ Steve Ward (3020 Badger Drive) <br />^ Sue Shaffer (3477 Bernal Avenue) <br />^ Talmadge Steele (2872 Gray Fox <br />Court) <br />^ Tim and Cathy Thomas (3234 Chablis <br />Court) <br />As of the writing of this staff report, staff has not received any further verbal or written com- <br />ments pertaining to this proposal. <br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />Environmental review for the proposed project is covered by an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration (IS/MND), which is attached. Staff believes that the project-related impacts are <br />mitigated, with the mitigation measures incorporated in the project's design or referenced with <br />conditions of approval, and that there would be no significant or unmitigated environmental im- <br />pact. Staff; therefore, believes that the Mitigated Negative Declaration can be issued in confor- <br />mance with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the Planning <br />Commission concurs with this environmental assessment, it must make the finding that the <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate prior to recommending approval of the proposed <br />project. The proposed project does not affect any California State Agencies. Therefore, the <br />IS/MND are not required to be sent to the State Clearinghouse of the Office of Planning for its <br />CEQA review period. <br />PCUP-165/PDR-529/PMOD-81-25-7M Page 42 of 36 December 13, 2006 <br />