My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
051507
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 11:14:37 AM
Creation date
5/11/2007 11:56:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 Attachments
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
X. CONCLUSION <br />The proposed project is a commercial center on an infill property in an existing business park <br />surrounded by business park uses. The subject property is zoned PUD-C (Planned Unit Devel- <br />opment -Commercial) District. This development is consistent with the Pleasanton General <br />Plan land use designations. The project will not include any activities or uses causing substan- <br />tial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly or on the environment. The <br />project has been designed to meet the general development standards required by the City of <br />Pleasanton and will incorporate conditions of approval to meet local codes and regulations. <br />'T'his development will serve the residential neighborhoods to the south, southwest, and south- <br />east. The proposed uses facilitate the traffic principle of pass by and internal trip capture to re- <br />duce its net impact to the City's street system. It would directly mitigate the Stanley Boule- <br />vard/Valley Avenue/Bernal Avenue intersection for the existing/approved/project scenario and <br />will contribute traffic fees for use to impacted intersections throughout the City. <br />Staff understands the community concern and opposition to the proposal based on traffic and <br />staff has been especially sensitive to this concern opposition in securing mitigation and design <br />features -for example, separated sidewalks for bicyclists and pedestrians, a radar detected speed <br />sign on Valley Avenue, etc. -for this development to ensure its positive contribution to the <br />community and the immediate area. Staff also believes that the proposed development in this <br />location would serve to reduce the number of cross-town trips on weekdays and weekends for <br />members of the community seeking these services. <br />If the Johnson Drive store should ever close, it is likely that another similar retailer would be <br />sited at that location generating a comparable numbers of trips. <br />XI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward Case I'CUP-165, PDR-529, and PMOD- <br />81-25-7M to the City Council with a recommendation of approval by taking the following ac- <br />tions: <br />Find that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental impact and that <br />the Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate by adopting a resolution recommend- <br />ing approval of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; <br />2. Find that the proposed project conforms to the Pleasanton General Plan; <br />3. Make the PUD Development Plan Findings 1 through 6 as stated in the staff report and <br />adopt a resolution recommending approval of Case PMOD-81-25-7M subject to Exhibit <br />"C", Conditions of approval; <br />3. Make the Conditional Use Permit Findings 1 through 3 as stated in the staff report; and, <br />PCUP-165/PDR-529/PMOD-81-25-7M Page ~F6 of d7 December 13, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.