My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
051507
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 11:14:37 AM
Creation date
5/11/2007 11:56:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 Attachments
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Garland Draper, 4031 Schween Court, spoke in opposition to this project. She was concerned that <br />the traffic on Valley Avenue would be further worsened. She objected to the additional noise in <br />a quiet residential neighborhood and did not believe it had been sufficiently addressed. She <br />would like to see along-term infrastructure plan to solve the already severe traffic situations in <br />the Valley Avenue/Bernal Avenue/Stanley Boulevard areas. She believed the traffic report <br />associated with Home Depot was flawed and did not include data from the Shadow Cliffs <br />buildout and the waterslide. She noted that it also did not include the possible closure of the <br />Johnson Drive Home Depot and would like these traffic issues to be addressed by the City <br />Council before this project is addressed. She would also like the Stoneridge Drive extension to <br />be completed before this project were to be considered. She noted that her neighbor, Hank <br />Jones, requested that she read his email since he could not attend: <br />"I would like to communicate my thoughts regarding the Home Depot you are proposing <br />to place on the corner of Valley and Stanley. I would love to have a Home Depot so <br />close to my residence, but the traffic situation is really bad already. Unless traffic was <br />reduced on Santa Rita and Valley Avenues, there would be no way that I would support <br />this development. <br />"Let me explain. In the morning I take my son to Harvest Park Middle School. He <br />would no longer ride his bike because he was hit last year, and he's scared, and I know <br />this for a fact. When I go to turn on Valley from Kolln, I am faced with a long line of <br />commuters heading towards Santa Rita. They are all coming from Livermore. Unless I <br />get really aggressive, I cannot get onto Valley until the signal light changes. Once on <br />Valley, the traffic is so bad that getting across Santa Rita takes up to three cycles of the <br />signal light. <br />"In the evening, we sometimes have to go east on Valley, getting out of Orloff onto Kolln <br />can be a real pain because commuters are sometimes stacked up beyond Orloff waiting to <br />turn onto Valley. This makes getting onto Kolln difficult - we have to wait through one <br />or two cycles to get onto Valley once we get onto Kolln. Once on Valley headed east, we <br />are faced with a long, long line of cars waiting to turn on Stanley and get to Livermore. <br />That intersection was rated a "D" two years ago, and obviously it's worse now. <br />"I do not know how you could put in a Home Depot, Longs, drive-through Starbucks, <br />several retail outlets and still say that traffic levels will remain at a "D". It's not logical, <br />even with the modifications you plan for Valley and Stanley. As I see it, there's only one <br />cure for the load of traffic we have on Valley and Santa Rita -this is traffic that has an <br />imprisoning effect on our children. That would be to open what has been promised to us <br />for years, and has been reneged on by some members of the Council. This is something <br />that was used to push through development in the Stoneridge area. This is something that <br />was planned for and disclosed to all residents who purchased homes around Stoneridge. <br />I'm talking about the El Charro extension to Stanley, and the Stoneridge extension to El <br />Charro. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINi.JTES, December 13, 2006 Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.