My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
051507
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2007 11:14:37 AM
Creation date
5/11/2007 11:56:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 Attachments
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nue and Utah Street and the Bernal Avenue retail center located on the west side of <br />Bernal Avenue opposite the Home Depot site. <br />Therefore, the applicant's payment of traffic fees along with the construction of the Stanley/Val- <br />ley/Bernal intersection improvements implements Program 2.5 of the Circulation Element of the <br />Pleasanton General Plan, which states, <br />"Require whatever mitigation measures are necessary, including the withholding <br />of building permits, to return intersections to acceptable levels, in the event that <br />LOS "D" is exceeded." <br />California Splash Traffic <br />"fhe Dowling traffic report did not include the approved trips for the California Splash develop- <br />ment given that its trips were determined to be primarily oft=peak trips, thereby not impacting <br />the weekday a.m./p.m. peak commute hours: 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., <br />respectively. <br />Loop Road Alternative <br />The traffic analysis also reviewed in detail the effect of a loop road located as a connection from <br />the parking area at the east boundary adjacent to the P. G. & E. substation site. This review <br />evaluated the surrounding circulation and levels-of-service. The loop road alternative was <br />evaluated to see if it would mitigate the LOS conditions at the Stanley/Valley/Bernal intersec- <br />tion without the need to widen any leg of this intersection. However, the report shows that the <br />improvements to I,OS brought about by the loop road alone would be negligible and would still <br />require roadway widening/modification of the intersection. The loop road also raised various <br />concerns pertaining to the project's building and site design treatments. The alternative would <br />have also required acquisition of additional right-of--way from P. G. & E. Staff does not rec- <br />ommend the loop road alternative in that it would require direct access from Nevada Court along <br />with changing the cul-de-sac to a through lane. These changes would impact the Congregation <br />Beth Emek, facing Nevada Court. The Congregation Beth F,mek have stated their opposition to <br />the loop road as noted above. <br />Valley Avenue Traffic Levels <br />Valley Avenue neighbors expressed their concerns regarding the proposed project and its impact <br />to the Valley Avenue traftc levels. The following table contains a summary of those impacts to <br />five Valley Avenue intersections for the a.m./p.m. peak hour volumes, based on the information <br />provided in traffic study in the following figures: <br />^ Figure 2 -Approved Conditions i~olumes and Geometries <br />^ Figure 3 -Project Only Traffic i~olume <br />^ Figure 4 -Approved + Project Wit{aout Loop Road volumes and Geometries <br />PCUP-165/PDR-529/PMOD-81-25-7M Page 20 of 36 December 13, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.