My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
17 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 5:17:02 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 5:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
remaining deposits on the lots' unimproved areas could experience future soil <br />movement. However, the potential movement would be downslope and away <br />from the improvements, such that the building pads and other upslope <br />improvements would not be affected. <br />The erosion hazard on the hill slopes is severe to very severe where water runoff <br />is rapid. Soils underlying the project site have high shrink-swell potential, which <br />could damage buildings and infrastructure if the potentially expansive soils are <br />not considered in the project design and construction. Corrosive soils, if present, <br />could dissolve or weaken underground utilities and structural components, such <br />as metal and concrete. <br />Mitigations Measures <br />Mitigation measures for the above-described issues are addressed in the draft <br />conditions of approval and include: <br />The applicant is required to undertake a detailed, design-level geotechnical <br />investigation and, based upon this investigation, to submit adesign-level <br />geotechnical report with the tentative subdivision map application. This second <br />evaluation and report is the engineering design report that will address the <br />technical aspects of dragging, drainage, retaining walls, streets, etc. The report <br />will be peer reviewed by a geotechnical consultant selected by the City. The <br />recommendations specified in the report and by the peer review consultant will <br />be incorporated into the development's grading and improvement plan designs <br />for review and approval by the City Engineer before the Planning Commission's <br />action on the tentative subdivision map. <br />During the mass grading of the subdivision, the applicant shall arrange and pay <br />for a geotechnical engineer, the selection subject to the approval of the City <br />Engineer, to be present on-site at all times to inspect and approve all subdivision <br />improvements and to prepare and submit progress reports to the City Engineer. <br />This is considered to be standard City practice on the development of hillside <br />properties in geologically sensitive areas. <br />^ The applicant is required to create a Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GRAD) <br />for this development covering the public and private areas. The GRAD will <br />administer an ongoing Slope Management Program over these areas, which will <br />include periodic inspections and reports to the City on public land and to the <br />Homeowners Association on private land. <br />The applicant proposes that the GRAD assume the management responsibilities of <br />some areas of the development -fire buffer areas, reforestation areas, etc. -that would <br />otherwise be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Staff considers the <br />applicant's request workable and has included this option -Homeowners Association or <br />GRAD where applicable, and subject to the City Engineer's determination - in the draft <br />conditions of approval. The determination would be made prior to the approval of the <br />first final subdivision map. <br />PUD-33 Page 36 of 59 June 13, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.