Laserfiche WebLink
195 <br /> <br />near the church. He stated his congregation is not opposed to <br />annexation and will share in the prorata share cost of the line. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated he is opposed to allowing sewer <br />connection but can support connecting to the water line. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 89-206, authorizing the <br />connection of 10971 Dublin Canyon Road to the City water system, <br />provided all main expension and connection work is done to the <br />satisfaction of the City Engineer and all costs are borne by the <br />property owner; and requiring the owner to sign a Water Facilities <br />and Preannexation Agreement for future annexation, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Tarver <br /> <br />item 12c <br />Municipal Code Revisions Pertaining to Recreational Facilities <br /> Mayor Mercer declared this item removed from the agenda at <br />the request of staff. <br /> <br />item 12d <br />Report and Recommendation Regarding Remodeling of Old Library <br />Facility for use as a Preschool Center <br /> Ms. Bengtson presented her report (SR 89:204) dated May 2, <br />1989, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Butler, that Resolution No. 89-207, approving the <br />selection of Mr. Michael Goldsworthy to provide design studies and <br />construction documents for the preschool facility, for $25,000, as <br />per the proposal submitted January 19, 1989, utilizing the bid <br />design/build option, conditional upon Council review and approval <br />of a standard City contract; and appropriating $200,000, including <br />$25,000 for architectural services, for the project from either <br />the General Fund or the Park Capital Improvement Fund, be <br />adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmembers Brandes and Tarver <br /> <br />item 12e <br />Review of Bids and Award of Contract for Foothill Road Booster <br />Pump No. 1 - NPID No. 2 <br /> Mr. Elliott presented his report (SR 89:196) dated May 2, <br />1989, regarding this matter and his memorandum dated April 28, <br />1989, which report and memorandum explained the staff's reasons <br />why the bid of Lionsgate Corporation, the low bidder on the <br />project, should be rejected. <br /> <br /> - 13 - 5-2-89 <br /> <br /> <br />