Laserfiche WebLink
· : 287 <br /> <br />Consider Ordinance Establishing the "Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement Dis- <br />trict", and Providing for Levy of Charges <br /> Mr. MacDonald presented his report (SR 83:520) dated November 17, 1983, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Ms. Judy Mayhew, President of the Pleasanton Downtown Business Association, and <br />a downtown business merchant, presented a map showing the proposed districts. She <br />reviewed the background of the downtown association and their voluntary efforts in <br />trying to upgrade and beautify the downtown area. She stated that the establishment <br />of a downto~ Pleasanton business improvement district as provided for in AB 1693, <br />would accomplish what the downtown association or a single business could not do, <br />and it will greatly benefit all the merchants. She stated that Pleasanton has a <br />unique downtown area that makes it different from most other cities, and this should <br />be preserved. Ms. Mayhew advised that not all businesses are in favor of the forma- <br />tion of the improvement district. She stated she had met with most of the retailers <br />and that all have been invited to meetings regarding this matter. She added that <br />most of the response has been positive. <br /> <br /> Mr. Larry Annis, 99 West Neal Street, stated he favors AB 1693, which would allow <br />the formation of the Pleasanton Downtown Improvement District. He stated that as a <br />downtown businessman he sees a need to look to the future. He advised that some re- <br />tailers are going out of business and that people are not shopping downtown. He urged <br />that the improvements to downtown be a coordinated effort, not done piecemeal. He <br />requested approval of the ordinance to initiate steps to form the Pleasanton Downtown <br />Improvement District. <br /> <br /> Mr. David Martin, Community First National Bank, 729 Main Street, stated that <br />some businesses have already contributed to this project in the way of providing <br />meeting rooms, distribution of newsletters, etc., and thus showing their support of <br />the formation of this improvement district. <br /> <br /> Ms. Lori Scott Venter, 210 Rose Avenue, stated she has always been a proponent <br />of establishing a heritage value for the downtown area. She stated it is extremely <br />important that the downtown uniqueness be preserved, She stated that downtown mer- <br />chants must create an attractive place to encourage shopping in this area. She <br />strongly urged approval of this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 4102 Fairlands Drive, with a business at 62 W. Neal Street, <br />stated that the Chamber of Commerce Board voted unanimously in support of the Downtown <br />Pleasanton Business Improvement District. He stated this will provide greater oppor- <br />tunity for creativity of downtown improvements. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roger Shanks, 690 Main Street, stated he had started his business on Main <br />Street four months ago. He advised he decided to locate in Pleasanton because of <br />the characteristic of downtown and its future potential to prosper. He stated he <br />felt that without this assessment district the downtown will not grow as quickly or <br />in the way that it should. <br /> <br /> Ms. Janet Schuren, partner, Hobbitt In, 724 Main Street, presented a petition, <br />with 31 signatures, which read as follows: ~ <br /> <br /> "We, the businesses, of downtown Pleasanton would like to counter the <br /> proposal now before you. <br /> "We feel the intent of the "Downtown Pleasanton Business Improvement District" <br /> is acceptable. However, we feel that the pro osed method of assessment is <br /> unfair. It is more equitable, reasonable, an~ feasible to assess each and <br /> every business, regardless of the classification, a flat fee. <br /> 5. 11/22/83 <br /> <br /> <br />