Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion ReSarding Proposition I Park Bond Act <br /> Mr. Walker advised that at the City Council meeting of February 10, 1981, <br />Council adopted Resolution No. 81-41, approving application for Park Bond funds. <br />He stated the percentage of funding allocation was first determined to be 85% for <br />cities and 15% regional. Now the allocation percentages being considered are 82.5% <br />for cities and 17.5% for regional. Mr. Walker advised this matter will be discussed <br />at the Mayors' Conference on March 11, 1981, with agreement by March 15, 1981, to be <br />able to apply for funds. After discussion, Council instructed the Mayor to retain' <br />the City position of 85% for cities and 15% for regional allocations for Proposition <br />I Park Bond Act funds. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />Legal Status of the Residential Allocation Program. <br /> Mayor Mercer declared this item continued to the meeting of April 14, 1981, as <br />determined by Council under Agenda Amendments. <br /> <br />Report regarding Affordable Housing <br /> Mayor Mercer declared this item continued to the meeting of April 14, 1981, to <br />be discussed with the Housing Element and the Residential Allocation Program. <br /> <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br /> There were no Communications presented at this meeting. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> Mr. Walker presented the Calendar for the information of the Council. <br /> <br />FURTHER DISCUSSION REGARDING APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL BY CASTLE- <br />WOOD PROPERTIES,. INC., ..FOR A HILLSIDE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE APPROXIMATELY <br />48-ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FOOTHILL ROAD <br /> Mr~ Dunkley asked for a clarification of the action taken by Council'regarding <br />this item. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated he had voted No because he felt the applicant should be <br />allowed to develop 22-24 lots. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler advised he had voted in favor of the alternate plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harris advised that the Planning Commission had not seen or approved the <br />alternate plan and that it would have to be referred back to them for review and <br />consideration. <br /> <br /> After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and <br />seconded by Councilmember Mohr, to rescind the action taken earlier by Council <br />on this item. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated he did not feel the Council should reconsider <br />those things already decided and which are irrelevant to a decision. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Mayor Mercer, that <br />Resolution No. 81-70, determining to refer back to the Planning Commission the <br />alternate plan relative to the application for development plan approval for a <br />Hillside Planned Development for the approximately 48 acre site located on the <br />west side of Foothill Road~ approximately 300 feet north of Bernal Avenue for a <br /> <br /> 13. 3/lo/sl <br /> <br /> <br />