Laserfiche WebLink
17.36.110 <br />Chapter 17.36 tibly due to more stringent sewage dis- <br /> charge standards, air quality concerns, <br />GROWTH MANAGEMENT cease-and-desist orders affecting sewage <br />PROGRAM connections, fluctuations in the econ- <br /> omy, litigation and similar problems <br />Sections: affecting development. During the <br />1736.110 Purpose. period since 1982 through the present, <br />1736.120 Objectives. the city has experienced rapid residential <br />1736.130 Allocation required. growth in response to the growth of the <br />1736.140 Exemptions. Bay Area economy and favorable interest <br />1736.150 Projects eligible to rates. The current continuing high level <br />apply. of applications for housing approvals <br />1736.160 Application procedure. would completely outstrip the city's abil- <br />1736.170 Approval process. ity to maintain current levels of public <br />1736.180 Criteria for decision. services unless moderated. <br />1736.185 Lower-income housing B. A more stable growth rate at the <br />project. average rate of approximately four per- <br />1736.190 Multiyear approvals. cent per year for the 1986 through 1996 <br />1736.200 Growth management period will permit our community to <br />agreements. evaluate the effects of recent growth <br />1736.210 Fees and exactions. upon the quality of life while developing <br />1736.220 Effect of approval. the new roads, fire stations, sewer capac- <br />1736.230 Lapse of approval. ity, water system, parks and schools nec- <br />1736.240 Subsequent essary to provide existing and future <br />modification. residents with at least the same level of <br /> service or, if practicable, improved levels <br />1736.110 Purpose. of service. This chapter establishes the <br />A. The city has undergone a variety of means by which this city can continue to <br />transformations inthe past decade which provide its fair share of regional housing <br />have affected the growth patterns, hous- needs and provide housing for all eco- <br />ing supply and availability of municipal nomic segments of the community con- <br />services. Prior to the mid-1960's, Pleas- sistent with our general plan policies, <br />anton was a rural community with pri- state housing law and our existing quality <br />wary emphasis upon agricultural of life. <br />activities. During the period 1963 to 1971 C. Significant changes in the growth <br />the community experienced an unprece- management process have been made to <br />dented growth due to the transition of simplify the procedures for reviewing <br />agricultural properties into housing sub- ~ and granting growth management <br />divisions; the community was one of the approval and to reduce the adverse <br />fastest growing communities in the state impacts of the former growth manage- <br />during the 1960's. Subsequent to 1971, ment program in the production of <br />the rate of growth has diminished percep- affordable housing while minimizing the <br />(Pleasanton I I-891 460 <br />EXHIBIT 8 <br />