My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
WELLS FARGO BANK - AGREEMENT MAR 1982
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
LONG TERM AGREEMENT
>
W
>
WELLS FARGO BANK - AGREEMENT MAR 1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2007 11:46:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2007 10:20:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DOCUMENT DATE
3/23/1982
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NAME
WELLS FARGO BANK
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - TYPE
MISC AGMT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - RECORD SERIES
704-06
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DESTRUCTION DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
necessary by the City I4anager. Developer agrees to participate <br />in the funding of such apparatus, manpower and other facilities <br />in whichever manner best achieves the maintenance of existing <br />levels of fire service through timely additions of fire safety <br />equipment facilities and personnel, as determined by City. <br />In determining the level of participation of such funding <br />agreed to herein, City shall take into consideration the project's. <br />contribution towards fire services in its ordinary contribution <br />towards funding city services generally (via taxes, etc.). <br />VI. DEVELOPER'S RIGHTS <br />With reference to each of the agreements contained .herein <br />to place subject site into one or more assessment districts,' <br />benefit districts, or other district or funding mechanism requir- <br />ing approval of all or a majority of properties so included, the <br />developer agrees to either (1) not protest the establishment of. <br />the district or (2) to affirmatively vote for the creation of <br />the district or other mechanism, depending on the manner of <br />creation of the funding mechanism. However, Developer retains <br />the right to protest that the allocation of costs among various <br />properties is inequitable under any of the above-mentioned funding <br />mechanisms. <br />In the event the assessment mechanism appears to impose <br />economically infeasible levels of cost upon the project site, the <br />City agrees to explore alternate financing methods. <br />VII. PROJECT COiv'DITIONS <br />Plothing herein shall lessen any obligation of Developer <br />required as a condition of project approval. As a further <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.