15 ATTACHMENT 9 - Laserfiche WebLink

Comparison of Previous and Current Plans Se tember 28, 2005 Plans Current Plans Location of New House To of the knoll To of the knoll Graded Pad Elevations 622 to 625 ft. 627.3 to 630.5 ft. Finished Floor Elevations 623 to 626.5 ft. 627.5 to 631 ft. House Size: First Floor 9,095 s . ft. 8,095 s . ft. Second Floor 3,300 s . ft. 2,920 s . ft. Basement 770 s . ft. 770 s . ft. Gara e 1,345 s . ft. 1,230 s . ft. Total Area without Gara e 13,165 s . ft. 11,785 s . ft. Total Area with Gara e 14,510 s . ft. 13,015 s . ft. Height (measured vertically from the lowest elevation of the building to the highest elevation of the building, excluding chimneys) 32.3 ft. (at main roof ridge) 37.8 ft. (top of the cupola, excluding the finial) 27 ft. 8 in. (at main roof ridge) 32 ft. 8 in. (top of the cupola, excluding the finial) Trees Removed 56 38 rn _~ 'Additional trees may need to be removed to accommodate v~ndenmg of the lower pornon oz ine pnva~c ruau. III. CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE WORKSHOP This workshop is the Commission's opportunity to direct the applicants and staff as to issues it wishes to be addressed. The areas noted below are those on which staff would find the Commission's input most helpful. Site and Grading Plans The previous Planning Commission Staff Report (please see Attachment #8) lists several goals, objectives, and guidelines of the VACSP that the Commission may consider when reviewing the site and grading plans. Discussion Points for the Site and Grading Plans Are the locations of the residence and pool house appropriate? The applicants feel that there are limited opportunities to place an additional house in the HR area while keeping the existing house, which is allowed. The Specific Plan indicates that all HR home sites must be located within the designated development areas as generally depicted on the land use plan. The land use plan shows the new home site immediately south of the existing home site. Staff notes that land use plans are not usually meant to be precise, but can be flexible. For the Reznick PUD, the Commission determined that the relocation of some of the home sites was consistent with the intent of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan PUD-32 Work Session .Page - 6 - June 28, 2UU6