My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-32, Daniel and Belinda Sarich <br />Work session to review and provide comments on an application for Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) development plan application to construct an approximately <br />14,510-square-foot single-family residence and an approximately 130-square-foot <br />poolhouse on the approximately 20-acre site located at 5 Tuscany Place (formerly <br />1630 Vineyard Avenue) in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. Zoning for <br />the property is PUD-LDR/HR/OS (Planned Unit Development -Low Density <br />ResidentiaUHillside ResidentiaVOpen Space) District. <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that she would recuse herself from this item due to a conflict of <br />interest because her residence is in close proximity to the project site. <br />Commissioner Blank disclosed that he had visited the site with the applicant. <br />Chairperson Maas disclosed that she had visited the neighboring property with Dr. Ford Roberts. <br />Commissioner Pearce disclosed that she had visited the site. <br />Commissioner Fox disclosed that she had visited the site with Peter MacDonald and Tom Pico <br />earlier in the day. <br />Ms. Decker presented the staff report and described the history, scope, and layout of the <br />proposed project. The applicant recently amended the site plan, which provided staff an <br />opportunity to revisit some comments made in the initial staff report. She noted that six <br />low-density residential sites could be developed at the most northerly portion of the project site. <br />The existing home may be kept with another new residential site in this location. She added that <br />this was a very conceptual plan and pointed out the various features of the proposed site. Some <br />grading will be required to create the flat pad, and the Planning Department requested direction <br />regarding that issue. The applicants have indicated that cut material from the grading would be <br />utilized in filling other areas on the site. One of their main objectives was to use any fill material <br />to terrace or step or create actual vineyards along the frontage in preparation for future <br />development. <br />Staff noted that the two-story residence was well articulated. Staff was very interested in the <br />visual impact of sites and noted that the applicant had provided sections depicting the line of site <br />from Vineyard Avenue to the proposed residence. She presented the applicants' representatives <br />who would present the details of the architecture. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Peter MacDonald, representing the applications, noted that Dan and Belinda Sarich bought this <br />property in 2000 and have been working continuously since then to get this project to this point. <br />He noted that Tom Pico would address the key issue of the site location. He added that the <br />architect, John McGinnis, was a very highly regarded architect who was accustomed to Planning <br />Commission workshops; he would listen very carefully to the Commission's directions. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, September 28, 2005 Page 1 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.