My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
031808
>
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2008 1:56:39 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 4:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I. SUMMARY <br />The proposed Sarich residence is not supported by staff in the form that is being presented to the <br />Planning Commission. The proposal does not appear to meet the goals, policies, intent, or <br />implementation of the Vineyard Avenue Comdor Specific Plan (VACSP). The applicants have <br />presented much the same design since the preliminary review process was begun in 2002. <br />Should the Planning Commission provide direction to both the applicants and planning staff that <br />the proposal can be supported, it would require a Specific Plan Amendment that would not be <br />site specific, but rather be the direction from this point forward for all proposals. This project <br />represents the opportunity for the Commission to reevaluate the VACSP to provide more <br />flexibility in future project proposals as to the issues of: <br />Location of structures <br />Architecture/Design <br />• Building materials and colors <br />Loss of oak woodland <br />Tree preservation <br />Grading/Drainage <br />Loss of ridge top by over excavation <br />Landscaping <br />• Screening of structures <br />The appropriate environmental document would be required per the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) to study these impacts not looked at in the previous documents. <br />II. BACKGROUND <br />On June 1, 1999, the City Council approved a Specific Plan and Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) prezoning/rezoning for the 384-acre area commonly referred to as Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor located in southeast Pleasanton. <br />The Sarich property is Lot 27 in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. The subject <br />site has three land use designations: 1) Low Density Residential (LDR), 2) Hillside Residential <br />(HR), and 3) Open Space (OS) (please see Attachment #4). The LDR area is shown on <br />approximately four acres in the northeastern portion of the site fronting Old Vineyard Avenue. <br />The HR area is an approximately one-acre area located near the southeast corner of the property. <br />The OS area is the remainder of the site characterized by an existing oak woodland. A total of <br />eight residential units are approved for Lot 27: one existing and one new dwelling in the HR <br />area and six new dwellings in the LDR area. <br />PUD-32 Page - 2 - June 8, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.