15 ATTACHMENT 9 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O'Connor agreed with Commissioners Pearce and Blank and believed that flexibility within reason would be acceptable as long as it stayed within the intent of the Specific Plan. Commissioner Olson shared Commissioner O' Connor's view and added that if a home were to be built at the garage site, there would be some environmental problems such as destroying trees. He noted that there would also be a retaining wall issue. He would be in favor of moving this blob. Acting Chairperson Fox concurred with Commissioner Pearce's comments that a blob could be flexible as long as it adhered to certain standards. She did not think the residential unit location was intended to be on top of a demolished garage. 2. Is this the appropriate site for a structure, and is the proposed site acceptable? Commissioner O'Connor did not believe it fit the intent of the Specific Plan or that it preserved the ridgeline and what was originally planned as open space. He believed this was the highest point on the property, which did not meet the intent of the Specific Plan. Commissioner Olson noted that he looked at the top portion of the site earlier in the day and did not view it as a ridgeline; he viewed it as a knoll. In looking at the existing home and visualizing looking at building a home of this size on that spot, he believed it generated visibility problems on Vineyard Avenue. He believed the top of the knoll was the appropriate place to build the home. Commissioner Pearce noted that while it was not a ridgeline, she believed that the proposed location was not in keeping with the intent of the Specific Plan, which discussed preserving the topography. She believed the hillside and the knolls were significant parts of the topography. Commissioner Blank believed that this site was appropriate for "a" structure, not necessarily "this" structure. He believed that siting the existing home would cause more environmental issues, such as those described by Commissioner Olson. He believed there would be view problems from Vineyard Avenue and that there may be a massing problem in terms of the overall size. He believed the geography was being adapted to the home rather than the other way around. He agreed that it was not a ridgeline but believed that the project would take a lot out of the hill. Acting Chairperson Fox noted that she could envision siting a smaller home on the knoll's last ridgeline. She. had issues with the significant grading and cuts in the hill that would be necessary to support a significant footprint. 3. Over the 540 feet elevation what is the Commission's opinion on having atwo-story home? Commissioner Blank believed that if they followed the exact language of the Specific Plan, a Planning Commission or staff would not be needed. Although the Specific Plan encouraged single-story development above a certain level, he would rather approve an attractive, architecturally desirable, well-hidden two-story house than to force someone to potentially flatten the two-story home into a huge, long one-story home that would be an eyesore. EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 25, 2006 Page 4 of 6