My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091008
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 091008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:03 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 1:14:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 091008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lisa Johnson noted her confusion about when the retaining wall was permitted in <br />error to be installed. She stated that when she and her husband returned from <br />vacation on July 6, 2008, and saw the wall, she went to the City offices at 9:00 a.m. <br />on July 7, 2008 and spoke to Ms. Amos, who seemed just as surprised that the wall <br />had been built. She added that Ms. Amos indicated that she would let Ms. Decker <br />know and that someone would go out to the site to issue a citation and fine the job <br />because it was not to be done. <br />Ms. Johnston stated that she was also baffled at the July 10, 2008 Zoning <br />Administrator hearing when Mr. Jeffrey and Ms. Decker were conversing that the <br />wall that was built was fine and looks great, when she [Ms. Johnston] was under the <br />impression that the wall was the reason for the hearing. She added that while <br />Mr. Jeffrey stated that he tried to compromise at the meetings, her memory of the <br />meetings is that he sat there and said nothing and that there was no compromise. <br />She then asked what type of tree had been planted in the corner of his lot. <br />Steve Jeffrey reiterated that his intent from day one was to work with everyone and <br />get through it because he did not want to be where they are today. He noted that he <br />had no idea, owning three other houses in different cities, that he would ever be in <br />this situation. He reiterated that he did not know the CC&R's even existed. He <br />added that he has been to several meetings and has been working with the Planning <br />Division to get this resolved, but it appears there is no resolution. He stated that he <br />felt he has made a lot of progress with the Planning staff and that he has come a <br />long way from where they were before. <br />Commissioner Olson asked Mr. Jeffrey the species of tree in the corner yard, and <br />Mr. Jeffrey replied that it is Prunus Carolinians or a Cherry Laurel tree, which grows <br />about three feet a year. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if the applicant would plant shrubs so that the lower <br />area under the trees fills in. Mr. Jeffrey replied that the vegetation was taken out <br />prior to knowing that the CC&R's even existed. He stated that he had a chipper <br />come out and they were removed even before he learned about the rules. He <br />indicated that he wished he could go back, but he could not, so he worked with <br />Planning staff. He noted that he originally proposed 15-gallon trees, but when he <br />went to the nurseries, he got the largest trees he could find, which were a 24-inch <br />box trees. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that in the private sector, there are certain contracts for <br />certain products wherein a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or a Board of Directors say <br />they want to review the contract before it's signed or before the product is sold to a <br />certain customer. She noted that the Planning Commission also has things like this, <br />such as for a particular housing development, it would like to have these particular <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 10, 2008 Page 20 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.