My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior. This act <br />encompasses whole birds, parts of birds, and bird nests and eggs. <br />3.2.3 Birds of Prey <br />Birds of prey are also protected in California under provisions of the State Fish and Game Code, <br />Section 3503.5, which states that it is "unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the order <br />Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds of prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of <br />any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant <br />thereto." Construction disturbance during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss <br />of fertile eggs or nestlings, or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbance that causes nest <br />abandonment and/or loss of reproductive effort is considered "taking" by the CDFG. <br />3.2.4 Wetlands and Other Jurisdictional Waters <br />Natural drainage channels and adjacent wetlands may be considered "Waters of the United <br />States" (herea$er refened to as "jurisdictional waters") subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The extent of jurisdiction has been defined in the Code of <br />Federal Regulations but has also been subject to interpretation of the federal courts. <br />Jurisdictional waters generally include: <br />• All waters which aze currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to <br />use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the <br />ebb and flow of the tide; <br />• All interstate waters including interstate wetlands: <br />• All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent <br />streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa <br />lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect <br />interstate or foreign commerce; <br />• All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under <br />the definition; <br />• Tributaries ofwaters identified in pazagraphs (a)(1)-(4) (i.e. the bulleted items above). <br />As recently determined by the United States Supreme Court in Solid Waste Agency of Northern <br />Cook County v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (the SWANCC decision), channels and wetlands <br />isolated from other jurisdictional waters cannot be considered jurisdictional on the basis of their <br />use, hypothetical or observed, by migratory birds. <br />Ironwood 55+ Biotic Evaluation Live Oak Associates, /nc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.