Laserfiche WebLink
CORNERSTONE <br />C. EARTH GROUP <br />4.2 ESTIMATED GROUND SHAKING <br />Moderate to severe (design-level) earthquakes can cause strong ground shaking, which is the <br />case for most sites within the Bay Area. The Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis performed <br />by the California Geologic Survey indicated a peak horizontal ground acceleration for the site <br />with a 10 percent chance of exceedance in 50 years of approximately 0.6g for alluvial soil <br />conditions. This value is intended for reference only and is not intended for use in design or <br />analysis. <br />4.3 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL <br />During strong seismic shaking, cyclically-induced stresses can cause increased pore pressures <br />within a soil matrix that can result in liquefaction triggering, soil softening due to shear stress <br />loss, potentially significant ground deformation due to settlement within sandy liquefiable layers <br />as pore pressures dissipate, and/or flow failures in sloping ground or where open faces are <br />present (lateral spreading) (NCEER 1998). Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose, <br />saturated, uniformly graded, fine-grained sands and soft, saturated low plasticity silts and clays. <br />Limited field and laboratory data is available regarding ground deformation due to settlement; <br />however, settlement on the order of 2 to 3 percent of the liquefied layer thickness can occur in <br />saturated clean sand layers. <br />C Although localized layers of loose to medium dense sand were encountered in our borings <br />within the upper 15 feet, they are generally located above anticipated future ground water levels <br />of approximately 40 feet below existing site grades. Below this depth, granular soils are <br />generally dense to very dense. For these reasons, the potential for liquefaction during seismic <br />shaking is considered low. <br />4.4 SEISMIC SETTLEMENT/UNSATURATED SAND SHAKING <br />Strong seismic shaking can cause unsaturated cohesionless soils to consolidate. Soils most <br />susceptible to seismic settlement are loose to medium dense sands and gravels with relatively <br />low fines contents. Our borings encountered loose to medium dense sand and silty sand at <br />depths ranging from approximately 5 to 14 feet. The thickness of these layers ranged from 1 to <br />6 feet thick. Sands encountered at these depths had fines contents ranging varying from <br />approximately 7 to 40 percent. For our seismic settlement analysis, we assumed a low ground <br />water depth of at least 50 feet. <br />We evaluated the potential for seismically-induced settlement using the method proposed by <br />Pradel (1998). This analysis method estimates seismically-induced settlement based on the <br />Standard Penetration Test (SPT) blow count or N-value and the design earthquake <br />characteristics. Due to the inherent variability of the SPT and sensitivity of the SPT to test <br />procedures, it is necessary to correct SPT N-values to normalized values. <br />Ponderosa Active Adult Community Page 6 <br />132-2-1 <br />