My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, <br />NOES: Commissioner Fox. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Pearce. <br />Narum, O'Connor, and Olson. <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2008- 31 recommending approval of the Negative <br />Declaration and PC-2008-32 recommending approval of PUD-74 were entered and <br />adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that if the project is forwarded to the City Council <br />recommending review and approval, she would like to include something the <br />Commission could do to bring attention to the traffic mitigations discussed tonight. She <br />indicated that she totally understands the impacts are far less than if the property were <br />developed as a school, but at the same time, it adds cars to a bad intersection. She <br />noted that there are triple left-turn lanes at other parts of the City and that she was <br />struggling with the need for it at this intersection. <br />Chair Blank commented that the Commission could discuss this under Matters Initiated <br />by Commission Members and recommend that the City Council review this. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Commissioner Narum, but noted that it has nothing to <br />do with this project. He agreed with Chair Blank's suggestion to pass another resolution <br />and direct it to the City Council that as time goes by, it will be more and more difficult in <br />to get these types of projects approved because of an underlying problem with traffic, <br />especially at that intersection. <br />Ms. Decker advised that when projects are forwarded to the City Council, staff <br />discusses concerns described by the Planning Commission, and in light of this project's <br />discussion being part of the Traffic Study and being very detailed relating to this <br />particular intersection and its mitigation, the discussion will also be part of that staff <br />report to Council. She indicated that it is not necessary to pass a resolution, particularly <br />since this is a mitigation that the City Council is aware of. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she likes the idea of a resolution and agreed to <br />remove the traffic issue from this project. She noted that as Chair of the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission, she pushed for and succeeded in including the Alviso Adobe <br />project in the Council's top priorities. She agreed that the Council has a full plate but <br />feels that there needs to be a push at times. <br />Ms. Decker read a page that Mr. Otto brought to her attention on Program 2.3. of the <br />Circulation Element of the General Plan, as follows: "The Santa Rita RoadlValley <br />Avenue intersection is conditionally exempted from the City's LOS policy in that the <br />mitigation of adding a third southbound left-turn lane is a short-term mitigation with <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 9, 2008 Page 19 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.