Laserfiche WebLink
PUD-74 Environmental Checklist <br />BAAQMD nor any other agency has adopted significance criteria or methodologies for <br />estimating a project's potential contribution of GHGs or evaluating its significance, if any, no <br />individual development project, such as the proposed project, could, by itself, generate sufficient <br />emissions of GHGs to result in a significant impact in the context of the cumulative effects of <br />GHG emissions globally. <br />The proposed project would also be required to meet Title 24 energy efficiency standazds and the <br />City's Green Building Ordinance, both of which would help to reduce future energy demand. In <br />addition, since the subject site is limited to residents aged 55 years and older, the proposed <br />project would produce fewer vehicle trips and, therefore, fewer GHGs, than typical detached <br />single-family home developments that are not age restricted. <br />While these measures would not eliminate all project GHG emissions, their inclusion in the <br />project would result in a lower GHG emissions level than had they not been incorporated into the <br />project. It is also important to note that future state actions taken pursuant to Califomia Global <br />Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill No. 32) including requirements for lower <br />carbon-content in motor vehicle fuels, improved vehicle mileage standards, and increased share <br />of renewable energy in electricity generation will also serve, over time, to further reduce GHG <br />emissions related to the proposed project. Therefore, project effects on GHG emissions would <br />not be cumulatively considerable, are negligible, and, therefore, the cumulative effects would be <br />less than significant. <br />4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />Environmental Setting <br />The site had historically been farmed for several decades. Approximately 10 yeazs ago the <br />farming ceased, and since that time the site has remained vacant except for a temporary <br />constmction yazd with construction access road and several soil stockpiles. Therefore, the site <br />has not supported a natural habitat component for several decades. <br />Wetlands are regulated under federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies. Primary <br />wetland regulatory compliance is under the Federal Clean Water Act, the Califomia Department <br />of Fish and Game (CDFG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br />The Clean Water Act requires avoidance of wetlands whenever a practicable alternative exists. <br />For unavoidable impacts, the regulatory agencies have policies calling for mitigation to provide <br />"no net loss" of acreage or habitat value. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit <br />must be obtained for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. <br />Under the CDFG code, Sections 1601-1607 regulate projects with divert, obstruct, or change the <br />natural flow, bed, channel, or bank of a river, stream, or lake. Proponents of such projects must <br />notify DFG and enter into a streambed alteration agreement. DFG normally exerts jurisdiction <br />over natural streams and artificial channels that have habitat value for wildlife species. The <br />jurisdiction extends to the bank top. <br />13 <br />