09 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-74 Environmental Checklist Environmental Health. The development ofthis project does not anticipate a loss of groundwater recharge potential. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. c,d) There is no existing stream, river, lake, drainage channel, or other water body/course on the subject property. Site development will slightly alter the existing drainage pattern from its existing condition. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. g-i) Housing will not be placed within a 100-year flood hazard area. The development will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. j) The City of Pleasanton is not at risk from seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. 9. LAND USE PLANNING Environmental Setting The 23-acre site is undeveloped. Properties adjacent to the site include: single-family homes in the Ironwood neighborhood to the west; the City's Operation Service Center to the south; old Mohr Avenue right of way and a Zone 71ake to the north; and a portion of the former Hanson Aggregates quarry property (now owned by Legacy Partners) to the east. Standards of Significance For purposes ofthis environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project would: • Substantially alter an approved land use plan that would result in physical change to the environment. Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Land Use Planning Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policyy or regulation of an agency with Jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zomng ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^X ^ ^X 25