My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD-74 Environmental Checklist <br />airstrip, would the project expose people residing <br />or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? <br />Discussion <br />a,e) For single-family housing projects, the City's General Plan generally requires that <br />backyard areas not exceed 60 dB La„ and that indoor noise levels not exceed 45 dB La,,. <br />In addition, if the noise source is aircraft, the General Plan states that residential <br />developments should be strongly discouraged where exterior noise levels exceed 55 dB <br />La„ due to aircraft and should not be allowed in areas where exterior noise levels exceed <br />65 dB La„ due to aircraft. A noise studyb was prepazed to ensure that the project will <br />meet General Plan noise standazds. The noise study indicates that the aircraft noise <br />exposure at the site is less than 55 dB La„ and that traffic noise exposure at the site is less <br />than 60 dB La,,. Therefore, noise levels from traffic and airport noise would be aless- <br />than-significant-impact. <br />The project site is exposed to intermittent noise from the City's Operations Service <br />Center. The noise study indicated that the police firing range, which is located <br />approximately 630 feet from the project's southern boundary, would be the most <br />significant noise source from the OSC. The noise study indicates that gunshot noise is <br />significantly more annoying than traffic noise at the same level. The noise study <br />recommends that noise levels from gunshots be reduced to not exceed 40 dBA Lmax <br />inside the residences with the windows and exterior doors closed. In order to meet this <br />interior noise standard, the noise study indicates that the windows and exterior doors on <br />the east, west, and south sides of the units on Lots 3, 4, and 91-96 would need to provide <br />at least 25 dBA of noise reduction on the first floor and provide at least 35 dBA of noise <br />reduction on the second floor. These units would also need to be provided with forced air <br />mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning) so that windows and doors maybe closed at <br />the discretion of the occupants to control noise. The exact Sound Transmission Class <br />(STC) ratings of the windows and doors to meet these requirements would be determined <br />at the building permit stage. Conditions of approval will require the project comply with <br />the recommendations listed in the geotechnical report. Therefore, this would be aless- <br />than-significant-impact. <br />b-d) The development of residential uses on the property will generate added urban noise, <br />such as traffic, landscape maintenance activities, etc. However, noise levels will not <br />change substantially from that currently experienced in the area. <br />Short-term construction noise would be generated during any new construction of this <br />site. The hours of construction will be limited to minimize any impact to surrounding <br />land uses, particularly the adjacent residences. Construction equipment would be <br />required to meet DMV noise standards and be equipped with muffling devices. These <br />requirements will be made as conditions of the project approval. <br />Therefore, these items would be ales-than-significant-impact. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.