My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2009 1:21:44 PM
Creation date
2/12/2009 4:35:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A fence elevation and typical fencing locations have been shown on the front yard landscape <br />plan, Sheet L5. Staff finds the fence design and locations to be acceptable. A condition of <br />approval requires that a fencing plan be provided for all of the lots in the development. <br />V. PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br />The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development District and "considerations" to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br />plan. <br />1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare: <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br />public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the <br />installation of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order <br />to serve the new lots. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br />accommodated by existing City streets and intersections in the area. The structures <br />would be designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, <br />and other applicable City codes. The proposed development is compatible with the <br />adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing scale and character of the area. <br />Adequate setbacks would be provided between the new dwellings and the existing <br />structures on the adjacent properties. <br />Therefore, staff believes that the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests <br />of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable <br />specific plan: <br />The site's "Public and Institutional/Medium Density Residential" General Plan Land Use <br />Designation allows either public school or medium density residential senior housing <br />land uses. The Medium Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation allows <br />for 2 to 8 dwelling units per acre (DUA) and a midpoint density of 5 DUA. This project, <br />as proposed, calculates to 4.8 DUA. The proposed medium density residential senior <br />housing development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. <br />The proposed project would further several General Plan Programs and Policies <br />encouraging new housing to be developed in infill and peripheral areas that are adjacent <br />to existing residential development and for the City to attain a variety of housing sizes, <br />types, densities, designs, and prices which meet the existing and projected needs of all <br />economic segments of the community. The project would also meet a General Plan <br />Housing Element policy to provide for the special-housing needs of large families, the <br />PUD-74 Page - 17 - June 25, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.