Laserfiche WebLink
Dolores Bem~tson -was surprised to Icarn that this projcct had gained approval before it was brought <br />before the Trails Committee for review and input She was concerned that there could be an issue at a <br />later date with inappropriate and insufficient access to the trails fi~om the development Ms. Bengtson <br />felt that denying seniors access to the trails would be wrong and she he something that is planned ahead. <br />She lclt the plan should be given back to Ponderosa for them to come up with a good recommendation <br />and urged the Trails Ad Hoc Committee to think of future residents of the development so that they will <br />be able to access the trail easily <br />.lonathan Krueger- agreed with the comments made by Ms. Bengtson regarding resident's access to <br />trails fi~om the development. He had concams about lad< of trail connection to other trails. <br />Chairperson Kummer closed the meeting for public comments at 7:20 p.m. <br />Mr. Rajs also agreed with Ms. Bengtson's comments and would recommend not ruling out the option of <br />having Ponderosa consider changing the plan. Ms. Wahl agreed that an additional access to wails would <br />benefit senior residents of the development. <br />Mr. Strcng felt it would be a disservice to the residcnts not to provide them the additional access and that <br />long-term alTccls should be taken into consideration. He suggested staff direct Ponderosa to explore <br />trail connection access on the north-end of the projcct with the inclusion of a secure gate option for the <br />safety of residcnts. <br />Chairperson I{ummer was concerned with the "big picture" and future access to the proposed lakes area. <br />Ile regrets that this projcct was not brought to this committee Ior review when it was in the earlier <br />planning stages. Ile advised that he had walked the site last week with Parks and Recreation <br />Conunissimicr, Jerry Pcntin. <br />The Committee discussed their concerns and recommendations with Ms. Harding and Associate Planner, <br />Stcvc Otto. 'they reviewed the proposed site plan and suggested Ponderosa explore other options as <br />possible trails access locations. <br />A motion was made by Mr. Strcng, seconded by Mr. Rajs, recommending that Ponderosa Homes <br />explore the feasibility of securing Cuturc Uails access from the north-end of the Proposed h~onwood <br />Active Adult Development, with the inclusion of a secure gate option for the safety of residents. <br />ROLI. CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Committee members Rajs, Sedlalc, Strcng Wahl, and Chairperson Kummer. <br />NOES: None <br />ABSLN"1~: Conunitteemembcrs Casamajor, Durban, and I{olar. <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Chairperson I<ununcr thanked Ms. Harding for approaching him about concerns for accessing trails <br />from the Ponderosa projcct. <br />R. 'frail Projects Status Report <br />Trails Ad Floc Committee <br />January 2G, 2009 <br />Page _ <br />