04 ATTACHMENT 10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Page I of 1 Mary Lu Campbell SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - - .P-wcided3Q._#h_e City Council From: Mary Lu Campbell After Distribution of PaCkOt �T Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:15 PM Q2� �j --0 [ To: Robin Giffin Date - Cc: Nelson Fialho; Maria Hoey; Cheryl Cook- Ka31io; Cindy McGovern; Jennifer Hosterman; Jerry Thorne; Matt Sullivan Subject: RE: P P-1 1/PRZ-44 Stoneridge SPecific Plan AmendmenttStaples Ranch Project February 2, 2009 Dear Ms. 'duel: Thank you for your message expressing your support for extending Stoneridge Drive. Be assured a copy of your message is being provided to the Mayor and Members of the City Council so they may have the benefit of your opinion. Mary Lu Campbell Executive Assistant City of Pleasanton P.O. Box 520 Pleasanton, CA 94566 -0802 Front: ff Seat: Monday, February 02, 2009 10:26 AM To: Robin Giffin Subject: PSP-II/PPZ-44 Stoneridge Specific Plan Amendment/ taples Ranch Project Please continue with plans to get Stoneridge Drive built while we have commitment from other government organizations to improve related road improvements in the region and are willing to pay part of the costs. We need improved traffic circulation in Pleasanton, and Stoneridge has always been in the plan to provide a 2nd east/west artery in addition to Valley. Also, did Pleasanton not make a commitment to those sane government organizations that we would keep Stoneridge in our General Plan? Stoneridge Extension will be a good option for people who work in Hacienda Business Park and live in the north portion of Pleasanton and Livermore. Right nova, Stoneridge is a four lane "boulevard" that does not carry near the volume of traffic for which it was intended. Right now, we have real safety issues for kids trying to get to school because of the traffic congestion. Safety for our children has always been a priority for our city. Stoneridge would certainly help with that congestion issue. La onne Youel 1546 Trimin harry Drive Pleasanton, CA 94566 9