My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121008
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 121008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:58 PM
Creation date
3/10/2009 9:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the facility is checked every two years to ensure it remains current with certifications. <br />Chair Blank noted that there is also the Good Samaritan law, which relieves <br />someone of liability. <br />Commissioner Fox further inquired if the City could be liable if the reason the facility <br />is not licensed is because an exemption has been put in place, which is not backed <br />by State law and by the California Code of Regulations. Ms. Seto replied that with <br />the current application, the City would be relying on the State's exemption provided <br />by Ms. Suzanne Bothwell's letter, Exhibit D of the staff report. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that the exemption is obviously not for the 16 hours <br />or less and inquired what it was based upon for this application. Ms. Seto replied <br />that the Department of Social Services has indicated and granted an exemption for <br />the hours of operation or a facility that operates for more than 15 hours but no more <br />than 12-week sessions. Commissioner O'Connorthen inquired who was <br />responsible for ensuring the sessions are no more than 12 weeks. Ms. Seto replied <br />that it is the responsibility of the County's Community Care Licensing under the <br />State Department of Social Services. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she would be open to eliminating Condition No. 9 <br />regarding children being escorted to and from the restroom. She then referred to <br />Condition No. 16 and inquired about the use of the word "church." Ms. Decker <br />replied that Condition No. 9 referred to the application at a previous location that had <br />common restrooms outside the facility and would not be applicable at the new <br />location as the restrooms are located within the facility. She added that Condition <br />No. 16 also referred to the previous applicant and can likewise be deleted as the <br />church is not relocating. <br />With respect to the outdoor play area, Commissioner Narum stated that she did not <br />visit the new site and expressed concern during the summer when the children <br />would be on-site from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. She indicated that she would not want <br />to see the children limited to inside a building during that time but would like them to <br />have some kind of outdoor recreation breaks. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she did notwant to tell the applicant how to run <br />the facility's program. She suggested that staff craft some language indicating that <br />this would be reviewed by the Director of Community Development. <br />Mr. Dolan agreed and advised the Commission that it is likely the only logical place <br />for an outdoor play area would be in a fenced-off portion of the asphalted parking lot <br />where pads might be put in. <br />Chair Blank noted that Quarry Lane School's outdoor play area is all asphalt and <br />concrete. Commissioner Fox suggested having something like the foam surface at <br />Orloff Park or a rubber material that covers the parking lot at the Fountainhead <br />Montessori in Dublin. Commissioner Pearce stated thatshe did not want to get into <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 23 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.