My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00059
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2005 4:54:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2000 12:00:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2000
DOCUMENT NO
00059
NOTES
TRI-VALLEY
NOTES 3
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />9. Update Action Plan <br /> <br />the TSOs continue to be met. Achievement of the TSOs depends upon successful imple- <br />mentation of the actions, measures, and programs set forth in Chapter 9, "Action Plan." <br /> <br />In Contra Costa County, if, following good faith implementation of the Action Plan, a TSO <br />is not met, then the Plan would need to be reevaluated through the forum of TVTC and <br />SWAT. Amendments to the Plan could include a relaxation of TSOs, a strengthening of <br />actions, or a combination of these approaches. In Alameda County, the jurisdiction with <br />the TSO violation can elect to modify growth rates, improve the facility, or seek a lower <br />TSO standard through the amendment process set forth in this chapter. <br /> <br />The TSOs related to mode split and average vehicle ridership are goals for achievement by <br />2010. They need to be monitored and adjustments to the plan made if progress is not being <br />made. Progress should be defined as increasing transit ridership and increasing average ve- <br />hicle ridership. <br /> <br />The TSOs should be monitored, as part of the updating of the Action Plans. The following <br />describes how each should be measured. Each jurisdiction should report the results of their <br />monitoring activities to the TV T AC for review. Any TSO violations should be forwarded <br />to the TVTe with recommended actions. <br /> <br />Freeway Levels of Service. The TSOs are expressed both in terms of volume-to-capacity ratio <br />(VIe) and hours of congestion. Volume-to-capacity ratio and hours of congestion can be <br />measured with traffic counts or speed runs and should apply to mixed-flow lanes only. The <br />plan uses a capacity of 2,200 vehicles per lane per hour (1,100 vehicles capacity for auxil- <br />iary lanes). Traffic counts can also be used to show duration of congestion. Freeway <br />monitoring should be done by Caltrans or the C!v1A. <br /> <br />Intersection Levels of Service. Intersection levels of service should be calculated using the VCCC <br />program for AM and PM peak hours based on turning-movement counts. Intersection <br />monitoring should be conducted by the jurisdiction in which the intersection lies. The in. <br />tent of the TVTP is to maintain the intersection TSO at all signalized intersections. How- <br />ever, to avoid extensive data collection, each jurisdiction should establish a list of critical <br />intersection for monitoring. <br /> <br />Mode Split. Mode split is virtually impossible to measure in the field, except through exten- <br />sive home interview and work place surveys. These data are available every decade from <br />the U.S. Census and periodically from MTC. In between times, transit ridership should be <br />monitored as a surrogate for mode split. The mode split goal of the TVTP can only be met <br />if transit ridership increases annually. The transit operators routinely collect and report <br />annual ridership. <br /> <br />18 April 2000 <br /> <br />Page 69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.