My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00059
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2005 4:54:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2000 12:00:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2000
DOCUMENT NO
00059
NOTES
TRI-VALLEY
NOTES 3
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Tri.VallefTransportation Plan/Actlan Plan Update <br /> <br />If neither of these can be done, approval of the General Plan amendment may lead to a <br />finding of non-compliance with the Growth Management Program. <br /> <br />Amending the Plan <br /> <br />Amendments can be triggered by: periodic review of the plan (every two to four years); <br />identification of TSO violations; a jurisdiction's proposal to adopt a major general plan <br />amendment that was not considered in the existing plan; and/or a change in the major as- <br />sumptions underlying the Plan. A change in the assumptions for Gateway Constraints <br />would constitute the latter. <br /> <br />This plan is based upon the assumption that major gateways into Tri-Valley will not be ex- <br />panded beyond the capacities assumed in the Expected Network as set forth in Chapter 5. <br />Any change in these assumptions, such as the addition of HOV lanes on 1-580 over the <br />Altamont Pass, would require that this plan be amended to incorporate revised assumptions <br />for the Tri~Valley gateway constraints. Increased capacity at the gateways could signifi- <br />cantly increase projected congestion on downstream freeway sections and arterial streets. <br /> <br />As specified in the Joint Powers Agreement governing the TVTC, amendments to the plan <br />will require a unanimous vote of all members of the TVTC. <br /> <br />Conflict Rosolutlon <br /> <br />Because of the importance of support for the Plan by all members of the TVTe, the Coun- <br />cil should act on a consensus basis. However, some cases mllY arise in which consensus <br />cannot be reached. In cases where conflict exists between jurisdiction within one counry, <br />resolution should be negotiated through the forum of the Congestion Management Agency <br />for the respective county. In cases where conflict exists between jurisdictions in different <br />counties, resolution should be negotiated through the TVTe with the provisions of the <br />Joint Powers Agreement applying. These provisions state the following: <br /> <br />1. Unanimous vote of all members required for plan adoption and amendment. <br /> <br />2. Unanimous vote of all members required for adoption of annual work program and <br />budget. <br /> <br />3. Five votes required for grant applications, expenditure of funds, execution of contractS. <br />adoption of rules of procedure. <br /> <br />4. Majority vote of all members present required for action on any other matter. <br /> <br />Page 72 <br /> <br />18 April 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.