Laserfiche WebLink
In any portion of a parcel, however, an individual project's <br />density may either be greater than the maximum density or be <br />less than the minimum density shown in Table 3.2 for that parcel. <br />[For example, Parcel 11 (an approximately 21 acre site <br />with a density range of 5 to 8 units per acre) may be <br />developed with athirteen-acre single-family project at 3 <br />units/acre (less than the minimum), a three-acre muhiple- <br />family project at 12 units/acre (greater than the <br />maximum), and afive-acre single-family project at 5 <br />units/acre (within the range). In this example, the 21 acre <br />parcel would have a total of 114 dwelling units at an <br />average density of 5.4 units/acre (within the allowable <br />range), but it would have individual projects at densities <br />above, below and within the designated range.] <br />5.3 Statutorily defined second units (i.e., "granny flats"), assisted living <br />units, congregate care and other specialized group housing units shall not <br />count toward [he allowable development potential for any parcel or <br />against the limitations established in Policy 6. <br />Residential Policy 6: Total Phase I Allowable Density. Limit the <br />development of Phase I of the total site to a maximum of 600 total residential <br />units, and limit [he Central, Western and Eastern Areas [o a maximum level <br />consistent with traffic constraints. <br />Cumet.txES: <br />6.1 Second units, assisted living units, congregate care and other specialized <br />group housing units shall not count toward the total Phase I density. <br />6.2 The maximum residential development potential for each major area may <br />not exceed the projected traffic generation anticipated for each major <br />area according to the Specific Plan EIR. <br />Traffic studies done for the Specific Plan fl It show satisfactory <br />levels of service and adequate operational characteristics (queuing <br />lengths, turn lane lengths, etc.) for the Specific Plan traffic as <br />distributed for those studies. Due [o the flexibility desired for the <br />Specific Plan land use policies, modifications to the land use <br />program may result in changes to traffic generated by those uses- <br />and may allow a different composition of units within the Plan w <br />3-12 <br />