My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00111A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00111A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2008 11:32:27 AM
Creation date
9/11/2000 9:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2000
DOCUMENT NO
RES 00111
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In 1994, the Alameda County Boazd of Supervisors adopted its East County Area Plan. That <br />plan is a portion of the Alameda County General Plan, and, along with other plan elements and <br />documents, establishes land use policies for the eastern portion of the County, including the <br />property. The protracted plarning process with the City of Pleasanton, together with Alameda <br />County's adoption of the East County Area Pars prompted [he City and County of San <br />Francisco to enter into a planning process with [he County of Alameda. San Francisco filed an <br />application for development of the property, including adoption of a specific plan, with the <br />County in September of 1994. The Drafr Specific Plan and the Draft EIR on the Specific Plan <br />were published in March 1995. <br />During that same period, the City of Pleasanton irtitiated apre-zoning of the site and prepared <br />a llraft EIR for pre-zoning and annexation of the SFWD site, the Pleasanton Middle School <br />and [he ACTG. The Draft EIR was published in March of 1995. <br />The Cooperative Plan Agreement <br />In September 1995, the County of Alameda, the City of Pleasanton, and the City and County <br />of San Francisco agreed to "temporarily defer their independent itritiatives for the property in <br />order to review the County Draft Specific Plan and attempt to draft refinements to this plan <br />that a6 of the parties can agree to." <br />A "Committee of llecision-Makers" was formed, comprised of two members each of the <br />Alameda County Board of Supervisors, [he Pleasanton City Council, and the San Francisco <br />Public Otility Commission, to guide this process. An intensive four month effort followed, <br />resulting in a land development program intended [o reflect a reasonable balance of complex <br />regional and local public interests, as well as the economic objectives and limitations of the <br />respective public agencies. This land development program is referred to as the Cooperative <br />Plan. The thtee parties then affirmed their intent to use best efforts to achieve the following: <br />- ~ --- - -,- '.-,...-::......ii~c!! would agree to allow the property to be <br />annexed [o and developed within the City of Pleasanton, provided [hat Pleasanton <br />approves a land use program consistent with the Cooperative Plan and permits an <br />economically viable project, <br />-~~~-••- - -' -..-:..~..~:_;i~ci~wouldcommittoreviseitsapplicationpending <br />before Alameda County to reflect the modifications achieved through [he cooperative <br />planning process, <br />Alameda County would agree to process and take action on the project based on the <br />mutually acceptable plan, and <br />I-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.