My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00111A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00111A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2008 11:32:27 AM
Creation date
9/11/2000 9:56:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2000
DOCUMENT NO
RES 00111
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
assuming that the Ciry of Pleasanton eventually adopted a specific plan, Alameda <br />County would negotiate a good faith agreement for tax sharing preliminary to <br />.. annexation of the property to the Ciry of Pleasanton. <br />San Francisco revised its application with the County to reflect the Cooperative Plan <br />agreement, and Alameda County processed and took action on the project in August of 1996, <br />adopting the revised Specific Plan (or Cooperative Plan), including certification of the Final <br />EIR, and approval of a development agreement and Provisions of Reclassification (PD zoning <br />conditions). <br />At the same time, SFWD filed an application for approval of a specific plan, following the <br />Cooperative Plan tenets, with the City of Pleasanton. <br />Pleasanton's Preferred Plan <br />Pleasanton began its project review by holding a series of public workshops. In order to <br />better explore the opportunities presented by development of this last large area of the~i'in, <br />Pleasanton commissioned preparation of a series of alternatives that were to retain the land <br />uses and development plan contained in the Cooperative Plan, while incorporating "neo- <br />traditional" land use themes and accommodating other City-desired changes. These <br />alternatives were further refined through a series of workshops, culminating in a single <br />"Preferred Plan." A revised and updated EIR reflecting the "Preferred Plan" was completed <br />and circulated for review. This EIR was cettified in February 2000. The "Preferred Plan" <br />was reviewed by City reviewing bodies in a series of public hearings. As a result of these <br />hearings, the "Preferred Plan" was set aside in November 1999 in order to allow a Ciry <br />initiative [o purchase the majority of the site. <br />Measure I Plan <br />Pleasanton sought to acquire about 427 acres of the -;,.:..:. ~ , : ' - - SI ~~~. U <br />property by (1) entitling 72 acres for residential and commercial/office development which=n.a <br />-_-' . _._ .. :..,;,.SIN'll would sell (for at least $50 million), and (2) selling <br />general obligation bonds [o raise $50 million to cover the balance of~,. -~.-':.-,.~: <br />~~, ,'s sales price of about $100 million. This plan specified the intensities of <br />the entitled lands as well as the infrastructure required to support it. These were spelled out in <br />the "Terms of Agreement" which was to govern the various land sales transactions. <br />Pleasanton established the San Francisco Bernal Property Task Force to review potential uses <br />for the 427 acres [o be acquired by the City. The Task Force completed a "Final <br />I-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.