My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 01063
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
RES 01063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2001 11:41:59 PM
Creation date
7/20/2001 8:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2001
DOCUMENT NO
RES 01063
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Ayala did not fe~l that requiring a market study for this site would require a <br />similar study for other sites within the Business Park. <br /> <br />Ms. Dennis asked if any use could be considered as part of a market study? <br /> <br />Mr. Swift said yes. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti pointed out there is a two-story office building being constructed <br />on Gibraltar right behind Pedro's. <br /> <br />Mayor Pico declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br /> Scott Graeser, Chamberlin Associates, 5880 West Las Positas Boulevard, Suite <br />51, thanked the planning staff for their assistance. He expressed his belief that this <br />process should be nothing more than design review because the proposed project <br />complies with the existing zoning and meets ail the PUD requirements. He believed that <br />over the last fifteen years the market has done its own study and indicated a <br />restaurant/retail use of this site is not viable. The letter included in the staff report from <br />Colliers International further supports this. He pointed out that analysis was not paid for <br />by Chamberlin Associates. He felt it was important to point out the Planning <br />Commission denied the project because it wanted Council involved in this. It could not <br />simply deny the project, but had to initiate a rezoning. A lot of time was spent <br />developing the General Plan of the City and he believed this property was zoned as it was <br />to allow flexibility to insure a successful project on the site. <br /> <br /> He referred to the traffic model developed for the city and indicated that whether <br />a property was vacant or not was not the issue. The model includes the traffic that could <br />come from the allowed use on a specific site and how it impacts interchanges and <br />intersections. The proposed use for this site would generate less traffic than a restaurant <br />or other retail use. There would be 1000 fewer daily trips than a restaurant, 21 fewer <br />peak hour trips and will have a different traffic distribution. There will be ten more trips <br />in the PM northbound, however it will reduce impacts at the Stoneridge Drive <br />interchange by thirty PM trips and if there is no West Las Positas interchange, there will <br />be 36 fewer PM trips at the Stoneridge interchange. He believed the reduction of 36 PM <br />peak trips at Stoneridge more than outweighs the ten additional northbound trips. <br /> <br /> He believed the design of the building fits in with the uses immediately <br />surrounding this site. He described surrounding buildings and design elements. He <br />stated that a photovoltaic system has been incorporated into the project and it will provide <br />10-12% of the buildings power. I-Ie described the type of tenant that is proposed for the <br />office building and indicated that the major tenant is proposed to be Morgan Stanley <br />Dean Witter. <br /> <br /> Ernest Guzman, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, 6140 Stoneridge Mall Road, <br />indicated the company had been a corporate citizen of Pleasanton for twenty years. For <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 12 04/03/01 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.