RES 01063 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Dennis commented that the photovoltaic units were not required to be invisible if it would increase the efficiency. Mr. Campbell asked how the. Planning Commission review of the design would be different than what it did before. Mayor Pico explained that the Commission did not review the design and did not take action on that aspect of the application. Mr. Swift stated that the Commission did not take an official vote on the architecture, site design or anything else. Some Commissioners felt the building, by itself, was an attractive building, but also did not think it belonged on this site. He could not guess how the Commission would have voted on this architecture for this site. Ms. Dennis inquired about a peer review. Mr. Swift indicated that when staff believes it is necessary to have an architect review the architecture of a building, it does that. Staff did not feel it was necessary in this instance. The real issue with the Planning Commission was whether this was the right design for this particular site, not whether it was a poorly designed building. Ms. Dennis liked the design, but felt the Planning Commission should have the opportunity to review it. She wanted a peer review to be done so the Commission would have that information as well. Ms. Dennis withdrew her second to Ms. Miehelotti's motion. It was moved by Ms. Dennis, seconded by Mr. Campbell, adopt Resolution No. 01-029, to have a peer review of the buiiding's design and to refer the design of the project to the Planning Commission. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Campbell, and Mayor Pico NOES: Conn¢ilmember Michelotti ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ms. Michelotti left the meeting at 10:25 p.m. due to illness. Pleasanton City Council 19 Minutes 04~3~1