Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 9 <br /> The mitigation to return Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive from LOS E to an acceptable level of <br /> service is the same mitigation as in the proposed General Plan (see TR -1 -24 on page 3.4 -22.) <br /> Two One intersections, West Las Positas at Coronado Lane and Stoncridgc Drive at LI Charro <br /> would operate at an acceptable level of service in the Dispersed Growth Alternative but not in the <br /> proposed General Plan, prior to mitigation... <br /> On page 5 -20 of the DEIR, the second paragraph under transportation has been modified as follows: <br /> The discussion below is based on a level -of- service analysis for all intersections prior to the <br /> inclusion of mitigation measures. As part of this alternative, potentially significant effects due to <br /> level of service would be mitigated for all intersections that are not located in the Downtown or at <br /> gateway locations. <br /> The Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative, assuming the ITE data, would result in <br /> twenty 19 intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service. Comparing this alternative <br /> with the proposed General Plan shows that cix five intersections would operate at a level of <br /> service worse than, and having delays greater than, the proposed General Plan, and one <br /> intersection would change from an unacceptable operation level to acceptable. Of the ciY, five <br /> three two are located within the Downtown and are exempt from operating at LOS D or better, <br /> and therefore would not require measures to mitigate the impacts. One intersection is a gateway <br /> intersection and, as wit the proposed General Plan, would not be required to improve its operation <br /> to LOS D or better. This gateway intersection (East Bound I -580 off -ramp to Santa Rita Road) <br /> could result in a new potentially significant effect that may not be mitigated. Two other <br /> intersections would need—include the following additional mitigation measures to improve <br /> conditions to an acceptable LOS. <br /> Table 5 -10 on page 5 -21 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road <br /> intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br /> On page 5 -22 of the DEIR, the fourth paragraph has been modified as follows: <br /> Intersection operations for the other study intersections would generally operate under similar <br /> conditions with either the Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative or the proposed <br /> General Plan. As such, the Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative would result in <br /> greater impacts than would occur under the proposed General Plan, with one more intersection <br /> resulting in a potentially significant impact than the project. <br /> Hxhibt F. FIR Errata 3 July 2009 <br />