20 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Attachment 9 Of the 15 14 intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service in the No Project alternative, -1-1-10 of the intersections would require mitigation measures to improve conditions to acceptable LOS (four intersections are located Downtown and are exempt from operating at LOS D or better). Comparing this alternative to the proposed General Plan shows that seven six intersections would operate at a level of service worse than, and having delays greater than, the proposed General Plan and would require mitigation beyond those outlined in the proposed General Plan. (See Table 5 -6.) Of the seven, six five of the intersections would need additional mitigation measures to improve conditions to acceptable LOS (one intersection is located Downtown and is exempt from operating at LOS D or better). Note that this alternative would not cause any significant impacts at the intersection of Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive, as the project would and thus would not have the potential to result in a potentially significant impact that may not be mitigated. Table 5 -5 on page 5 -11 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. Table 5 -6 on page 5 -11 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. On page 5 -12 of the DEIR, the last bulleted item of the first paragraph has been deleted. Table 5 -7 on page 5 -12 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. On page 5 -12 of the DEIR, the first sentence of the first paragraph after Table 5 -7 has been modified as follows: The intersections shown in Table 5 -8 identify the five intersections that would operate acceptably with the No Project alternative but not with the proposed General Plan, prior to mitigation. Table 5 -9 on page 5 -16 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. On page 5 -16 of the DEIR, after Table 5 -9 the first three paragraphs (continuing onto page 5 -17 have been modified as follow: This discussion is based on a level -of- service analysis for all intersections prior to the inclusion of mitigation measures. As part of this alternative, potentially significant effects due to level of service would be mitigated for all intersections that are not located in the Downtown or at gateway locations. The Dispersed Growth Alternative would result in 14 intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service. All but two one of these intersections would operate at the same unacceptable level of service in the proposed General Plan (before mitigations). Bernal-at Main Street operates at WS E in the AM Peak hour in the Dispersed Growth Alternative; acceptable LOS (above LOS D) because the intersection is a Downtown intersection that is The intersection of Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive, while still failing in LOS, would operates at LOS E in the Dispersed Growth Alternative instead of LOS F in the proposed General Plan. D:xhibit F. I(IR Krrata 2 July 2009