My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
072109
>
20 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 12:03:38 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum noted that Program 7.6 references the gateway at Foothill and <br /> 1 -580. She added that it seemed to her that the Santa Rita Road gateway was also <br /> mentioned. <br /> Chair Pearce stated that she thinks the General Plan is a good but imperfect document. <br /> She noted that there has been significant public input and that she supported the <br /> comments made by Commissioner Olson and Narum regarding continuing public input <br /> should the document need to be modified in the future. She added that she would like <br /> the Commission to recommend this course of action to the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Blank moved to recommend that the City Council certify the Final <br /> Environmental Impact Report and adopt the CEQA Findings, Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations, and Draft Pleasanton General Plan 2005 -2025, with <br /> any amendments proposed by the Planning Commission; to specifically request <br /> that Janice Stern and her staff be commended for their outstanding work over the <br /> past four years; and to recommend to the City Council that the City Council <br /> develop contingency plans in the event that major assumptions of the General <br /> Plan, e.g., housing cap, etc., are subsequently invalidated, and that these <br /> contingency plans include a formal mechanism for the gathering and receiving of <br /> public input. <br /> Chair Pearce noted that the word "invalidated" is a fairly specific word and inquired if the <br /> Commission would like to replace it with "required to be modified." <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that modification would come from the City Council and that <br /> "invalidated" would refer to an outside agency. <br /> Chair Pearce asked Commissioner Blank if he wanted the public input process only if <br /> changes were made by an outside agency. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he is assuming that any City Council modification <br /> would go through the normal process of public input. <br /> Mr. Roush stated that he believed what Chair Pearce may be suggesting is that if the <br /> Commission is interested in having the Council consider some type of public input with <br /> due process, whether generated by the Council or an outside force, the Commission is <br /> interested in having that process in place. <br /> Commissioner Blank proposed stating, "invalidated or modified" so it covers both. <br /> Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br /> Commissioner Narum requested clarification regarding some of the potential changes <br /> that were discussed. <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2009 Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.