My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
072109
>
20 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 12:03:38 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 12:00:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
20 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank indicated that Ms. Stern noted some of the editorial changes, <br /> which were included in his motion under "amendments proposed by the Planning <br /> Commission." <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if the zoning change for East Pleasanton would be <br /> integrated into the Commission's recommendation to the Council. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the General Plan will not change any zoning. He noted that the <br /> current zoning is not the same as the General Plan land use designation. He added <br /> that without the approval of the upcoming Specific Plan, there will be an inconsistency <br /> between the General Plan and zoning and that the chances of getting anything <br /> approved is slim. <br /> Commissioner Blank asked Mr. Dolan if he and Mr. Roush were comfortable with the <br /> Commission not specifying the zoning. <br /> Mr. Roush replied that was correct. He stated that if the Commission adopts staff's <br /> recommendation, the property would have the Specific Plan designation with a more <br /> specific zoning designation which will be inconsistent to a certain extent with the <br /> Specific Plan, which does not contemplate that continued use. He noted, however, that <br /> the existing use will continue to go on. He added that if someone were to come into the <br /> City and ask for an expansion of that use in some way, there would be a problem <br /> because there would be an inconsistency between the Specific Plan designation and <br /> the expansion of what would be allowed under the zoning. He noted that as a practical <br /> matter, this would probably not occur because the property is not in the City. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None. <br /> RECUSED: None. <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner O'Connor. <br /> Resolution No. PC- 2009 -14, recommending that the City Council certify the Final <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the Draft Pleasanton General Plan 2005 -2025; <br /> Resolution No. PC- 2009 -15, recommending that the City Council adopt the CEQA <br /> Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared for the Final <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the Draft Pleasanton General Plan 2005 -2025; <br /> and Resolution No. PC- 2009 -16, recommending that the City Council adopt the <br /> Draft Pleasanton General Plan 2005 -2025, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 13, 2009 Page 9 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.