20 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Attachment 9 EIR ERRATA INTRODUCTION Since publication of the Final Environmental Impact Report, Responses to Comments for the Proposed Pleasanton General Plan 2005 -2025, Planning Division staff identified minor errors in the EIR text. These errors have been fixed and are shown as changes with the location of the changes identified. Revised or new language is underlined. Deleted language is indicated by strikeover (ctrikcover). CHANGES TO THE DRAFT EIR Chapter 5 Table 5 -4 on page 5 -8 has been changed as follows to be consistent with the text on pages 5 -14 to 5 -15 of the DEIR: [Partial] Table 5 -4 Project Alternatives Comparison of Impacts Proposed Dispersed Concentrated General No Project Growth Residential/Mixed Environmental Issue Plan Alternative Alternative Use Alternative r z r m o Ski II ;S*e�,si= i p .E K "pis evrs h i'�nEjuem Yet` ,,SIGs, �,�:.u"N :.E4E�� Expose persons to or generate noise LTS LTS LTS LTS levels in excess of the exterior noise standards Expose persons to or generate noise LTS LTS LTS LTS levels in excess of the interior noise standards Create a substantial temporary or LTS PS-LTS LTS LTS periodic increase in ambient construction noise levels in the project vicinity Expose persons to or generate LTS PS LTS LTS LTS excessive groundborne vibration The last three paragraphs on page 5 -10 of the DEIR are modified as follows: Fifteen Fourteen intersections do not meet the level of service standard in the No Project altemative. The proposed General Plan also contains I-5-14 intersections that fail to meet the level of service standard. Ten Nine of the fifteen fourteen failing intersections are the same intersections in the No Project alternative and proposed General Plan. There are five new intersections identified in the No Project alternative that would require mitigation, and with the No Project alternative, five proposed General Plan intersection mitigations would no longer be necessary. Hxhibit h- 1(1R I•rrata 1 July 2009