My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
NILES PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION 1984
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
LONG TERM AGREEMENT
>
A
>
ALAMEDA COUNTY
>
NILES PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2010 5:13:36 PM
Creation date
8/24/2009 9:06:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/1984
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NAME
NILES PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - TYPE
MISC AGMT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - RECORD SERIES
704-06 (Long Term Agreements)
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - DESTRUCTION DATE
PERMANENT
LONG TERM AGREEMENTS - NOTES
SOUTHERN PACIFIC
Link Groups
Link
2:
NILES PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION 1984
Last modified:
9/14/2010 5:13:36 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\LONG TERM AGREEMENT\A\ALAMEDA COUNTY
Comments:
TRACK CONSOLIDATION 1984
Link
1:
NILES PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION 1982
Last modified:
9/14/2010 5:13:23 PM
Path:
\CITY CLERK\LONG TERM AGREEMENT\A\ALAMEDA COUNTY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NILES - PLEASANTON TRACK CONSOLIDATION•PROJECT <br />SECTION IV - contd. <br />5. That the final sharing of the grade separation funds to be received <br />from the State of California in the allocated amount of $5,000,000 will be based <br />upon the percentage relationship that the total cost of the portion of the <br />completed project located within CITY, and the total cost of the portion of the <br />completed project located within the unincorporated area of COUNTY, bear to the <br />total combined cost of the completed project located within the said areas of <br />CITY and COUNTY. Upon determination of the final percentage entitlement of each <br />party hereto, any refund due either CITY or COUNTY because of an advance overpayment <br />made under the authority of paragraph 4 above will be made promptly by the party <br />that was overpaid. <br />6. Should anticipated total costs to COUNTY exceed $500,000, then <br />CITY and COUNTY must reach agreement in regard to such increased costs prior <br />to the awarding of the contract by CITY. <br />7. That those costs incurred by the two railroad companies involved <br />associated with permanent track relocations and the temporary rerouting of rail <br />traffic of The Western Pacific Railroad Company onto tracks of the Southern Pacific <br />Transportation Company, including track connections, signals and communications <br />changes, and other work associated therewith, as described in subparagraphs 6a <br />through 6e, Part I, of the aforesaid four -party agreement executed on March 23, <br />1982, shall be considered attributable to the project as a whole, and shall be <br />shared in the same percentage relationship as set forth in paragraph 5 above. <br />8. That this agreement shall be subject (a) to the geographic limit- <br />ations imposed by the State of California- County of Alameda agreement obligating <br />the State's payment of the allocated amount of $5,000,000 for expenditure on the <br />aforesaid track consolidation project, (b) to the method by which the State will <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.