Laserfiche WebLink
place, staff would require that the applicant add conduit, pull strings, location for the <br />inverter, and roof systems needed to be designed to handle an additional five- <br />pounds-per-square-foot load above whatever the project is designed for. <br />Chair Pearce complimented staff on the Conditions of Approval and stated that <br />having two separate sections for the project specific conditions and the standard <br />conditions was helpful to her. She acknowledged that affordable units would not be <br />concentrated in the building and inquired if any would be incorporated into the new <br />building. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that families must qualify for moderate or low-income status and <br />could move either into the new or existing buildings, based upon the availability of a <br />vacant unit. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Andy Byde, Braddock and Logan, reported that a number of years ago, a space <br />study and needs assessment was prepared for the site. He stated that it was <br />determined that the small gym, which is co-shared with the administrative leasing <br />office, was somewhat chaotic and residents and leasing agents indicated a strong <br />desire to have separate facilities. He added that the area was expanded and turned <br />into a separate tenant-only gym, and a separate facility only for leasing staff was <br />created. He stated that it was also determined that the tennis court had been a <br />nuisance as it has had an on-going need for repair and has not experienced much <br />use. <br />Mr. Byde stated that there has always been a high demand for the complex, <br />currently at 96 percent occupancy, which is the main purpose for the application to <br />add units and improve on-site facilities. He confirmed that affordable units will not <br />be concentrated in any one location. He also reported that prior to submitting their <br />application, they conducted a survey for residents in March of 2008, and the <br />residents were overwhelmingly supportive of the project with 185 pro, 3 opposed, <br />and 58 indifferent, 16 vacant units. He stated that they believe the project is unique <br />as it will cause little disruption to residents and will enhance onsite facilities and <br />provide affordable housing. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that it was a great project. <br />Commission Narum indicated that she was favorably impressed, particularly with the <br />amenities for the tenants. <br />Commissioner Olson agreed with Mr. Byde and stated that this would be a win-win <br />situation. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 25, 2009 Page 24 of 27 <br /> <br />