JUL 1950 TO MAY 1954 - Laserfiche WebLink

1 1 RESOLUTION 2256, approving payment to Engineer Goodridge, in the amount of $1,622.09, was adopted, on motion of Councilman Hewitson, seconded by Councilman Hansen. AYES: Councilmen_ Abrott, Cairo, Hansen, Hewitson and Trimingham. Another firal report is to be sent to the Division of Highways for extra work on Kottinger Avenue and Angela Street Contract stating that emergency was the reason for going ahead without the Division of Highways approval. Mr. Oxsen was recuested to measure 33 feet from the center line of. the Pleasanton -Sunol Road to determine if our fence is set back far enough. He was also asked to contact Engineer Goodridge to have him see County Surveyor, W. B. Boggs, to determine if they are going to raise the road more than 14 inches. Mrs. Wm. Hall stated to tree Council that the Annual Report from the 1-ious- ing Authority would be comnleted soon. Tnere being no further business to come be'ore the meeting, same was ad- journed at ll:Liu P.M. to meet again in regular session at 7:30 P.M. Dec. 1, 1952. C' y Clerk Pleasanton, California November 20, 1952 Informal meeting, called by the chair to meet with Mr. Carl Lassen. ROLL CALL showed present: Councilmen Abrott, Hansen, Hewitson, Cairo and Trimingham. After discussion of the drainage situation south of the Pleasanton effluent field, Mr. Lassen stated that he was ready to do his share as previously agreed. He asked the Town of Pleasanton to get permission from the City of San Francisco to go on their land and perform the neces- sary work. The Council explained to Mr. Lassen that the Town of Pleasan- ton did not want to be obligated in any respect as to any commitments on his proposed sub division due to his doing the aforesaid work on the canal. Mr. Lassen also called the Council's attention to the fact that he had offered the County of Alameda part of his land in order to straighten out the County Road as it approached Pleasanton from the south turning into First Street. He also offered them any dirt they might need for fill, free of charge. He stated that as yet the County had made no plans to make use of this offer, and suggested we contact our Supervisor on this matter. At the request of Mike Lebddeff, a review was made of our Taxi Ordir.ance. The Council sar no reason for any changes at this time. The subject of our recent te.iegram to Secretary of the Air Force Finle was brought up at the request of Mayor Trimingham. He stated that the purpose of the telegram had evidently been misunderstood, and that Cap- tain Creel, of the Santa Rita Rehabilitation Celtnter, had asked that we again consider passing a• resolution similar to that presented by him from the Oakland City Council. Mayor Trimingham stated that he explained to Captain Creel that the Pleasanton Council had objected to the word- ing of the main paragraph of the Oakland Council Resolution, but that the Pleasanton Council in no way objected to operatior of the Rehabilitation Center. That in fact, we wanted the Rehabilitation Center to be continued at Camp Shoemaker if it could possibly be done in agreement with the.plans of the Air Force. Mayor Trimingham presented a revised resolution drawn up by himself and Captain Creel, to be submitted to the Council for approval. After mucn discussion, Captain Creel was invited by telephone to attend the meeting to discuss the matter, but ne refused to attend., After review ing the original telegram sent to Washington, it was the opinion of the