Laserfiche WebLink
should be explained to the people of Pleasanton that regardless of any future develop- <br />ment, the reservoir is needed now. Mr. Oxsen was requested to write a letter to the <br />various organizations in Town in order that they may read it to those attending their <br />meetings. It was also agreed that the Councilmen should speak at these meetings when- <br />ever possible. <br />Mayor Trimingham reported on the Livermore- Pleasanton City Council meeting with the <br />Alameda County Planning Commission. He stated that by working with the Planning Com- <br />mission on the future development in fringe areas, the County would zone the areas,. <br />whenever possible, to suit the needs of those concerned. Nor. Oxsen was directed to <br />write to the Board of Supervisors requesting a report on existing land use in and <br />adjacent to Pleasanton and some of the problems which must be considered in the light <br />of past and future development. He was also asked to speak with Mr. Ruegnitz, of the <br />Alameda County Health Dept., in regard to the Health Dept. conferring with the Town <br />before issuing permits for septic tanks in this area. Supervisor Stanley will be in- <br />vited to the next meeting in order to discuss some of the above mentioned items. <br />STREETS AND BUILDINGS: <br />Councilman Cairo stated that the trees infront of Mel's Place that Mr. Mendonca.withed <br />to have removed are not dangerous; therefore, Mr. Mendonca's request was denied. <br />Councilman Cairo was requested to determine the City of Livermore and Hayward's regu- <br />rx.] lations in regard to placing leaves and lawn trimmings along the curb. <br />CITY HALL: <br />Mr. Oxsen stated that the matter of charging sales tax arid requiring business licenses <br />of the concessionaires at the Alameda County Fair this year should be decided upon <br />the near future. Mr. Bergstrom, Mr. Bartell and Dr. Dolan will be invited to the next <br />meeting to discuss this matter. <br />Councilman Hansen suggested that a proposition concerning Zone 5 of the Alameda Flood <br />Control and Water Conservation District be placed on the ballot with the bond issue; <br />however, most of the Councilmen f:at that any decision on the proposed Zone 5 should <br />be postponed until further explanation can be given the people. <br />POLICE DEPARTMENT: <br />Mr. Oxsen was requested to have the electric heater installed at the Jail by Mr. William <br />Clark for a cost of p135.00. <br />Councilman Hewitson stated that the Police Officers had contacted hirn in regard to <br />the Town re- imbursing them for uniforms soiled or damaged while on duty. He also stated <br />that the policemen would like a sergeant rating department. Councilman Hewitson was <br />requested to consult.the City of Livermore regarding the amount of uniform allowance <br />their police officers are given. The Police Department would also like to have more <br />publicity in the Pleasanton Times. It was agreed that any information given the Times <br />should come from either Chief Delucchi or Councilman Hewitson. Mayor Trimingham sug- <br />gested that one man remain in the office at night, or on foot, while the other patrols <br />in the police car; however, no decision was reached on the matter at this time. It <br />was felt by all, that a special meeting should be called with the policemen,in the <br />near future, to discuss the above matters. <br />There being no further business to come before the meeting, same was adjourned at <br />10:45 P.M. to meet again in regular adjourned session February 24th at 7 :30 P.M. <br />uL <br />ity Clerk <br />Pleasanton, California <br />February 24, 1953 <br />The City Coutcil met in regular adjourned session on the above date, with Mayor Trim <br />inham presiding. ROLL CALL showed present: Councilmen Abrott, Cairo, and Hewitson. <br />Absent: Councilman Hansen. <br />The Clerk notified the Council that she had an Affidavit of Posting Notice of Street <br />Vacation on file and that there had been no written protests. Therefore, RESOLUTION <br />2273, a Resolution vacating a portion of Walnut Drive, was adopted, on motion of <br />189 <br />