My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2010 JANUARY
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MUNICIPAL CODE SUPPLEMENTS
>
2010 JANUARY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2010 4:04:04 PM
Creation date
7/27/2010 3:51:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
CODE SUPPLEMENTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/1/2010
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENT NO. 3
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sections: <br />Chapter 17.36 <br />GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM* <br />17.36.010 Purpose. <br />17.36.020 Objectives. <br />17.36.030 Building permit restriction. <br />17.36.040 Exemptions. <br />17.36.050 Administration of the growth management program. <br />17.36.060 Establishment of annual new residential unit limits. <br />17.36.070 Apportionment of yearly total new residential units to categories of projects. <br />17.36.080 Approval procedures. <br />17.36.090 Use and loss of growth management approval. <br />17.36.100 Modification to projects with growth management approval. <br />17.36.110 Fees and exactions. <br />17.36.120 Application to prior approved projects. <br />* Prior ordinance history: Ords. 1614, 1567, 1545, 1538, 1505. 1466, 1413, 1403, 1 378, 1366, 1336. <br />463 <br />` 17.36.010 <br />17.36.010 Purpose. <br />A. Since the mid- 1960s, Pleasanton's transformation from a small, agricultural -based community to a suburban bed- <br />room community and then to a suburban `edge city" has been marked by periods of rapid growth which stressed <br />the city's ability to provide infrastructure and services, affecting the quality of life of both existing and new resi- <br />dents. <br />B. In order to minimize the adverse effects of rapid uncontrolled residential growth, the city council adopted its first <br />growth management ordinance in 1978, designed to regulate the location and rate of new residential growth in a <br />period of sewage treatment capacity constraints brought about by air quality degradation concerns. 'through the <br />1980s and 1990s, the city council modified the growth management ordinance in order to better achieve the <br />evolving goals set for it, with the rate, location, and type of residential units regulated to achieve the general wel- <br />fare of the city. <br />C. In 1996, the city council adopted a comprehensive revision to its general plan. Key goals and policies reflect the <br />city's continued commitment to developing in an efficient, orderly, and logical fashion, ensuring adequate infra- <br />structure and services are present to ensure that the city's quality of life and level of services are maintained. The <br />general plan calls for assuring its citizens of a predictable growth rate, while providing housing to meet the needs <br />of all economic segments of the community, regional housing needs, and employment growth. <br />D. Despite the controls established by past versions of the city's growth management program, residential develop- <br />ment has continued to fluctuate over time, there has been little predictability of the actual number of new building <br />permits issued and development under construction, and there is uncertainty over the city's ability to maintain its <br />service levels and quality of life for its citizens due to regional influences and uncertain revenue sources for city <br />and other local service- providing agencies. <br />E. This revised growth management program has been designed to rectify the areas wherein the former programs <br />did not totally succeed; to establish a predictable growth rate which reflects community sentiment and which al- <br />leviates the potential for strain on the ability of the city and other local service providers to keep pace with ser- <br />vices with no reduction in their quality; to continue to relate new residential growth to housing needs (including <br />regional needs and local employment growth) and the availability of infrastructure and services; to move toward <br />build -out of the community in a logical manner while affording future development areas the ability to accom- <br />modate changing housing demands; and to be fair and equitable to the development community, developers large <br />and small, who have either received past approvals under former growth management programs or who have un- <br />dertaken or will undertake development plans consistent with current goals and policies. (Ord. 1729 § 2, 1997) <br />(Pleasanton Stipp. No.3, 1 -10) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.