My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines Initial Study <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> The City has developed parks in the project vicinity. Two parks are located within Hacienda: 1) Owens <br /> Plaza Park with picnic tables, barbequcs, and both tot and youth play areas; and 2) Creekside Park with <br /> similar facilities to Owens Plaza Park plus restrooms, basketball, softball, and volleyball facilities. All the <br /> sites are within one -half mile of a park. The Thomas Hart Middle School gymnasium is also open to the <br /> public during some non - school hours with its basketball, volleyball, and restroom facilities. <br /> Within the Pleasanton Planning area are 16 community parks run by the City and two regional parks — <br /> Pleasanton Ridge Park and Shadow Cliffs Recreational Arca — that are run by the East Bay Regional <br /> Park District. The City also collects park in -lieu fees from multi - family development in the amount of <br /> $7,969 per unit. The standards and design guidelines also include requirements for on -site open space <br /> that would partially meet residerts' recreational and open space needs. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The Pleasanton General Plan includes Program 10.18 which states that a standard of at least 5 acres of <br /> neighborhood or community park per 1,000 people should be maintained. As of the publication of the <br /> City's General Plan in 2009, there was approximately 5.1 acres of parkland for every 1,000 population. <br /> This standard and the impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental <br /> topic. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> Less- than - Significant Impacts. Development of the project sites according to the Hacienda TOD <br /> Standards and Design Guidelines could potentially add up to 1595 residential units and about 30,000 <br /> square feet of commercial space. Assuming 2.3 persons per unit in the TOD units, the local population <br /> could increase by approximately 3,670 persons. Offsetting this increase in need for park and recreational <br /> services will be the requirement included in the Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines for <br /> private and group open space on site, and the City's requirement for dedication of park acreage or <br /> payment of park in -lieu fees. The park dedication requirement and the park in -lieu fees are calculated to <br /> offset the anticipated increase ir population by providing additional park space or the equivalent in fees <br /> to maintain the standard of 5 acres of neighborhood and community park for every 1,000 residents. If <br /> up to 1,595 units were added, park in -lieu fees paid to the City would total $12.7 million. Therefore, it is <br /> not expected that the additional development would increase the use of existing neighborhood and <br /> regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of any facility <br /> would occur or be accelerated. <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than No <br /> Significant with Mitigation Significant Impact <br /> Impact Incorporation Impact <br /> 16. Transportation /Traffic — WE ruld the project: <br /> a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the <br /> existing traffic load and capacity of the street ststem (i.e., result in X <br /> a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the <br /> volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? <br /> b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service X <br /> standard established by the county congestion management <br /> agency for designated roads or highw.n's? <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 29 2/11/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.