My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> Early in 2010, the City Council confirmed a 21- member Task Force with the mission of drafting <br /> guidelines and development regulations that will be used to evaluate mixed use or residential <br /> projects on sites near the Pleasanton /Dublin BART station. The idea of creating a lively, <br /> pedestrian- oriented, mixed use development with additional housing near BART in the <br /> Hacienda business park is embodied in Pleasanton's General Plan and is seen as consistent <br /> with the General Plan's sustainable development theme. In addition, three owners of <br /> properties close to the BART station expressed interest in the potential for residential or mixed <br /> use development, rather than building the office /R &D development which is already entitled. <br /> The Task Force has held fifteen meetings since March 2010, including a field trip to sites in the <br /> south bay and east bay, and has discussed various aspects of Transit Oriented Development <br /> including: the feasibility and best location for retail development, the appropriate design of <br /> Owens Drive and impacts on traffic circulation, the appropriate density and design of <br /> residential development, the need for and appropriate location of open space and pedestrian <br /> connections, and impacts on schools and infrastructure. The last several meetings of the <br /> Task Force were devoted to reviewing and refining several drafts of a document describing <br /> proposed development standards and guidelines. <br /> Among other requirements, the Settlement Agreement in the matter of Urban Habitat v. City of <br /> Pleasanton included several provisions related to development in Hacienda Business Park. <br /> These required adoption of certain core standards related to density, affordability and unit mix <br /> for Sites 1,2 and 3 (the W.P. Carey site just south of the BART station, the BRE site, at <br /> Gibraltar and Hacienda, and the northern portion of the Roche site on the south west corner of <br /> Gibraltar and Hacienda, respectively). The agreement also required the adoption of non -core <br /> development standards and guidelines. According to the agreement, the non -core standards <br /> and guidelines for Hacienda must be adopted by March 1, 2011. The Draft Hacienda TOD <br /> Standards and Guidelines (Exhibit A) incorporate both the core and non -core standards. <br /> HACIENDA TOD STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES <br /> The draft Hacienda TOD Standards and Design Guidelines accompanying this report <br /> comprise the core and non -core standards and provide direction to developers and property <br /> owners on the key components of use, density, building mass and height, setbacks, <br /> architectural features, open space, parking, access and street character. The Standards and <br /> Guidelines illustrate desired development on three vacant parcels near the BART station in <br /> Hacienda, and provide a framework for street improvements and connections between the <br /> parcels and BART. <br /> The document includes: <br /> • An Introduction section outlining the document's purpose, the development review <br /> process, the vision for development of the Hacienda TOD, and two framework <br /> diagrams providing context for future development and existing and future street and <br /> pedestrian improvements <br /> • A listing of the core PUD regulations consistent with the Settlement Agreement. <br /> Case No. PRZ -57, City of Pleasanron Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.