My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
021511
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 4:54:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2011 2:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/10/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issue: Resolution: <br /> Impacts of development on Pleasanton The Task Force recommends a Joint Meeting <br /> Unified School District and concerns between the City Council and the Pleasanton <br /> regarding overcrowding in local area Unified School District Board to discuss the <br /> schools. potential impact of development in Hacienda and <br /> additional city -wide residential development <br /> _ considered for the Housin. Element Update. <br /> Union request regarding using local hires. The Task Force recommends the City Council <br /> address this issue at the development plan sta.e. <br /> Request for more detail on the specific Staff notes that specific affordability levels for the <br /> income levels of households for affordable 130 "very low income" units required by the <br /> units. Settlement Agreement will be addressed in the <br /> affordable housing agreement between the City <br /> and the developer. <br /> What funding sources are available for Staff and consultants are preparing a list of <br /> affordable housing /mixed use projects in potential funding sources including MTC, ABAG, <br /> Transit Oriented Developments? Funding CalTrans Livable Communities Grants, etc. This <br /> sources for infrastructure improvements? will be available prior to the City Council <br /> consideration of the TOD Standards and Design <br /> Guidelines. <br /> Providing services to lower income tenants. Staff notes that such services are allowed uses <br /> _ .er the TOD Standards and Guidelines. <br /> Should the standards and guidelines See Memo from Rick Williams (Exhibit E). Note <br /> incorporate LEED ND requirements? that many LEED ND concepts are included in the <br /> TOD Standards /Guidelines and that projects will <br /> _ be sub'ect to Green Building /CalGreen. <br /> Potential for future condo conversions. The implications regarding the income - restricted <br /> units and the units affordable to moderate income <br /> households will be addressed in the Affordable <br /> Housing Agreement. <br /> How should the Hacienda PUD be amended This issue will be addressed by the City Council. <br /> to account for TOD development? <br /> Affordable housing: facilitate development Staff notes that the TOD Standards and <br /> by a non - profit? Guidelines would allow for an "inclusionary" project <br /> or a stand -alone development. <br /> As noted above, the Task Force has reached agreement on most of the topics covered in the <br /> standards and guidelines. A few areas remain where there are differences of opinion as to the <br /> approach to be taken in the document. These include: <br /> • Retail. The Retail Mixed Use Market Study Update (previously provided to the Planning <br /> Commission) concluded that a mixed use, transit- oriented development is well suited to <br /> accommodate a 45,000 to 65,000 square foot "Urban Village" at build -out, featuring a <br /> series of small retail spaces and anchored by a small specialty grocer /deli and /or <br /> pharmacy. The retail study identified the Owens Drive area at BART as the primary <br /> location. Subsequent discussion among Task Force members explored the option of <br /> starting with a smaller retail area and /or moving the location along Gibraltar west of <br /> Hacienda -- closer to the existing residential east of Hacienda, and toward the <br /> Case No. PRZ -57, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.